Jump to content

User Talk:Hayman30

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hayman30 (talk | contribs) at 14:21, 1 August 2017 (→‎Transdev Burnley Edit: S). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Archive box collapsable

Request for context

Hi Hayman30. I was wondering (as an admin) whether you could provide any background context about this, this, this, this, this and any others. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:30, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Zzuuzz: I believe it all started with literally a single revert I made on Cash (Chinese coin) two weeks ago. An IP user, who appears to be a recent major contributor to the article, moved a bunch of see also links into the body without specifically explaining why besides that they're editing on mobile, which doesn't make sense either since you can't edit the whole article or multiple sections at the same time on mobile. After that I received immediate personal attack (1, 2). There's also a discussion on the article's talk page that you could refer to in case it might be useful. Hayman30deservestodie is likely a sock of the IP user, as there's a image of Chineses coin on their user page from what I can recall. I never know Brain-made-out-of-Hayman30, Codename Alex, Widr 2 and Sunshine Alexi existed, but they're apparently also their socks, it's pretty obvious with them giving each other random barnstars and continuous claims of me not assuming good faith, not respecting mobile users and whatnot. They're also archiving talk page messages like a boss after they started using new IPs, although there's virtually nothing to archieve. I don't understand why they can't move on. Hayman30 (talk) 10:27, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the info. We had a Chinese money troll several years ago.. some quite strange behaviour. I'll knock these on the head - they might resurface but hopefully won't become a long term problem. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:00, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am the person who made some of those accounts though I did ask my friends to help too. I know that it sound odd but the reason why I did it was because Hayman30 never apologized and the deservestodie part referred to the anti mobile mentality of users as him not to the editor himself but if you all really perceive this as a problem then I will stop creating accounts and only edit as an IP but all I really want is an apology for the WP:BADFAITH reverts by this user. I will stop making accounts anyhow the reason I made more was because the ones with Widr in the name got blocked before I could even ask a question and the reason my IP is never the same is because I travel a lot for my work and edit occasionally while on a break. At least I hope that this can be resolved in a civil manner and the reason I got more aggressive was because my image got deleted based on a false copyright claim by @Daphne Pontier: or whatever despite literally my accounts asking why I constantly got blocked. For the record I am not Codename Alex that is the husband of a friend I am the rest. If only one person told me why I got blocked with Widr 2 which I only named as that as a reminder why I even made an account I would have never made more. Is an apology for a nonsense revert really too much to ask for? I never vandalized a single article. 2405:4800:1484:915E:BC16:D63F:761E:5FE8 (talk) 10:39, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to protect future readers from spoilers

Hi, I saw that you reverted a recent edit I made to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End_Times_(Breaking_Bad). I was simply adding a spoiler warning since reading the article personally ruined the ending for me, and I was hoping that others wouldn't be so unfortunate. If this was a violation if Wikipedia rules, I apologize, but otherwise, I was wondering if you could reconsider reverting the edit. 2601:249:C00:2AD8:315C:D019:855C:D87F (talk) 06:17, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting my edit on Glorious (Macklemore song)

For the change I made, a reference or citation should not be required. I merely corrected the article which mistakenly indicated a 3 piece horn section. Simply watching the performance in question, or following the already provided reference to view a screenshot, shows 4 people with brass instruments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.83.72.229 (talkcontribs) 08:53, 26 July 2017 (UTC) ** Correction, the screenshot shows 1 of the members with a guitar, but he does play trumpet as well during the performance, which can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-_ub09u3wo&t=3m45s[reply]

There's no such thing as "a reference or citation should not be required". Verifiability, not truth. Billboard magazine is a fairly reliable source in the music industry, so I wouldn't question its accuracy. Moreover, as far as I can tell, the member in white shirt you're talking about is a "guitarist *slash* percussionist" as Kaufman claimed, so I guess he doesn't count. Hayman30 (talk) 09:10, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The iOS 11 article is wrong

You recently undid a one word change that I made. The line "iOS 11 switches the top-left cellular network strength icons from five dots to four signal bars, similar to that before iOS 7.[43]" [1] is incorrect. There are five signal bars, not four. If you're curious, feel free to google "iOS 11" and you will see for yourself. Change it back if you want wikipedia to have correct information. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.24.96.142 (talkcontribs) 16:12, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

Hello user editing from 73.24.96.142, your change was removed because it's not supported by a reliable source. The sentence is also absolutely correct, I'm pretty sure there are four signal bars not five, the current source says four as well. Literally all images on Google are showing 4 signal bars, you might want to double check. And yes, I really want to maintain the correctness of information on Wikipedia, and that's why I reverted your change. If you've got multiple reliable sources to explicitly verify that there are actually five signal bars, feel free to come back and make the change again. Hayman30 (talk) 17:09, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also pinging LocalNet in case he might be interested.
Hey! AppleInsider states "four", and the image used in their article also has four bars. *However*, that article was about the June 9, 2017 beta. That's a pretty long time ago, and I think there have been several beta releases since then. It's possible that Apple has updated it with five in a newer beta, but that's not what our sources say. Verifiability is more important on Wikipedia than the truth, even as odd as that sounds for an "encyclopedia" :P LocalNet (talk) 17:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@LocalNet: Thanks for stopping by, I'm pretty sure it has not been changed since the first beta. I've took a quick look at build release articles on the Internet just now, none of them mentioned the signal bars. Moreover, I'm currently on the fourth developer beta as well, which is the latest preview version I believe, and it's showing four of them. Hayman30 (talk) 17:32, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well then this is both verifiable and true. Yay! :D haha LocalNet (talk) 17:33, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Request for namechange

Hi, our page Indigo (virtual assistant) has been rebranded to "Lyra". see www.heylyra.com. We would like to change the name of this page, and all of the instances of "Indigo" in the wikipedia listing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justin.mota (talkcontribs) 09:27, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LOWER BAY//THE SOUND

Hayman30 -- I'm a producer on this film and the studios Orion Pictures and Samuel Goldwyn films have changed the name of the film and released a proper poster.

Please see two official links showing this information below

http://deadline.com/2017/07/the-sound-rose-mcgowan-jenna-mattison-orion-samuel-goldwin-1202136198/ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4669278/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stormgiraffe (talkcontribs) 03:01, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oluwa2Chainz nominates articles for deletion for fun

Oluwa2Chainz Vandalises articles for no just reasons.

Go through his contributions and you will agree with me that he nominates articles for deletion just for fun. Mhubng (talk) 08:46, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Transdev Burnley Edit

Hi, I'm contacting you regarding my edit to Transdev in Burnley & Pendle. I'd like to let you know that they are currently re-branding into the Burnley Bus Company, as per, for example, their Twitter name and photo. Please put my edit back live, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dantheman2016 (talkcontribs) 14:20, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]