Talk:Eddie Haskell

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Informal Language

Should the term 'brown-noser' really be in an encyclopaedia entry? 86.153.153.81 (talk) 19:27, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't merge

Eddie Haskell has an identity that has come to transcend the show. The points mentioned below make great sense. PatriciaT 20:22, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't merge. Keeping them separate maintains the clarity, readability and thoroughness of each article, also the comment listed below is a strong reason. BLBaker 03:15, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I say leave it as a separate article, as it is frequently used as a label for a certain kind of behavior. 74s181 12:34, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't merge. I agree with the above three comments. Although generally, discussion of TV/Movie/Book/etc characters belong within the main article, Eddie has a separate cultural presence that deserves an article apart from the TV series. I've heard of Eddie Haskell referred to separately. BTW, I took out the extra "Don't merge" section headers. Becksguy 02:13, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not encyclopedic

I don't believe this page is of encyclopedic quality. To be specific, I don't believe "weaselly wise guy," should be used in an article. This part doesn't seem encyclopedic either: "However, when no parents were around, Eddie was always up to no good—either conniving with his friends or picking on Wally's younger brother, Beaver" --Kangaroo692 (talk) 01:26, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eddie Haskell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111009164412/http://www.livedash.com/transcript/the_fresh_prince_of_bel-air-(robbing_the_banks)/13/KOFY/Thursday_January_28_2010/144692/ to http://www.livedash.com/transcript/the_fresh_prince_of_bel-air-(robbing_the_banks)/13/KOFY/Thursday_January_28_2010/144692/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:10, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is a "third member"?

In the paragraph "Character overview", it is stated, "...One of his [Eddie's] most infamous pranks ... involved fastening a chain around the rear axle of their friend ...Rutherford's car, causing unplanned damage as the entire third member and wheels became detached when he tried to move the car..." I have searched many dictionaries, but can't find a thing about "third member". 68.35.173.107 (talk) 19:56, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]