User talk:DerricktanJCW
ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ss112 09:59, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
sing! China
How could you know who the winner is before result is announced?! Super Wang 14:16, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, DerricktanJCW. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Billy Koh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Billy Koh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billy Koh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cabayi (talk) 17:39, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Sezairi Sezali
Hello DerricktanJCW,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sezairi Sezali for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
MarkDask 03:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Conduct during Article for Deletion discussions
Greetings, I'm Exemplo347. I have noticed that you have been making duplicate !votes during Articles for Deletion discussions, and I'd like to ask you to stop. It's quite disruptive - feel free to comment as many times as you like, but only put Keep or Delete in bold ONE TIME. Regards. Exemplo347 (talk) 14:43, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Regarding Deletion of Child Actors' Articles
Hi DerrickTan
I don't understand why you are fighting so hard to remove all the articles on our child actors.
Is it worth it? To eradicate the achievements of these was-children? They cannot be child actors forever. But the fact that they had achieved that in their childhood and had an article approved for them is a sort of recognition. You could have just left them there, they have been there for years and they are not dead articles - some of them are even being updated in 2017.
The fact is that when they were child actors, the internet wasn't as widely developed and used. It thus explains why there are little records of them on the internet.
But I do not believe that their articles should be removed. I just do not understand why you are putting in so much effort to remove recognition and articles of our Singaporean child actors that have been around for awhile.
And can I just say, our Singaporean media was actually more relevant in those child actors' times compared to now.
I really do hope those articles can stay up, especially those who have award nominations and several titles of drama to their name. I feel like you're denying what little recognition Singapore has for our talent, past or present. Don't you agree that the entertainment scene in Singapore is already dying? I have asked around but most people nowadays only remember the child actors from way back, same as me. They don't even recognise any of those new actors who won awards and are 'full-time' Mediacorp artistes. That's the sad truth behind our media. Nobody cares anymore.
The more you delete, the more obsolete the Singapore entertainment scene becomes. I do strongly believe that what these child actors have done while they are young deserve some sort of recognition in order to cheer on the next generation, by remembering the past generation. It is sad that they had been there for years without a problem but we had to see them go in such a manner.
Please do reconsider it. There is no harm in letting these articles stay.
- Alex
- I have replied you on King of Hearts' talk page (User talk:King of Hearts#Regarding the Recent Page Deletion for Singaporean Child Actors. It's funny how you come across so sincere here while you bitch about me on another's editors talk page (you think I wouldn't have known? lol). DerricktanJCW (talk) 12:15, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Sing! China Title Card.png
Thanks for uploading File:Sing! China Title Card.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Sing! China Episode 5 edit dispute
Hi,
I seriously do not understand the motive behind your edit, and I hope you get this straight so that we don't end up in an edit war. I hope you will understand where I am coming from.
Response 1
Not mentioned on the show.
Look at the show again. I can provide you with these two links to refresh yourself. Asia Zhang: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKotyIQgGvI&feature=youtu.be&t=7m40s Jeffrey Chen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKotyIQgGvI&feature=youtu.be&t=14m9s If you don't believe what I say, the show is there for you to watch.
ALL AUDITIONEES ARE CALLED 抢星学员 OH MY GOD.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL Why don't you check the show again and tell me which auditionees other than the two of them are labelled "抢星学员"?
JUST STOP
Hello, how do you expect me to stop if I'm right? What you're saying is utter nonsense, so before you tell someone to stop, see if your edit is correct.
If after checking the show and you still don't believe me, you can check these. https://wx2.sinaimg.cn/orj360/005RgTDGgy1fhrxz375klj30ku0s9aes.jpg http://www.shangc.net/news/2017/0811/49147616.html
I hope you will stop this disruptive edit of yours, and that you know where I'm coming from. Thank you.
Response 2
Wow, it seems that you don't get it, do you?
Which part of the show says 抢星学员 are revival round contestants?
Look, which part of the show says that, take for example, 王乐汀's English name is Billdisc? Are you only going to derive your sources solely from the show? LOL It seems that you have derived your sources from not just the show, right?
http://ent.sina.com.cn/z/y/2016-08-08/doc-ifxutfpf1491603.shtml (By the way, in this article, the production team did clarify that "抢星学员" referred to revival round artists)
Here obviously shows who they are, and obviously Sina is a reliable source of information, right? You can't question the sources.
It is so subtle that nobody notices!
Duh, it might be subtle (although I noticed it), but in the locations in self-introductions are equally subtle as well. Also, the whole point of this page is to INFORM them about such information, regardless of how subtle it is! I'm pretty sure you have included a lot of subtle information in the pages too, right?
So this information is NOT IMPORTANT.
Wow, what a nice logic gap. Essentially you are contradicting yourself, because you are also accepting that this piece of information is true. But in the start, let me quote you: "Not mentioned on the show.", ALL AUDITIONEES ARE CALLED 抢星学员 OH MY GOD." (basically BS). Also, your perception of importance is rather distorted. Do you know how many people found Vinida's unexplained revival performance bizarre? Does it also imply that, in the Voice of China pages, we do not include the "revival round" mentioned?
I simply cannot understand your queer logic. Don't be so stuck up about this man, I seriously hope this will not result in a major edit war. Please stop this disruptive edit of yours. Thank you, and feel free to leave me a message on my talk page.