Jump to content

User talk:Black Kite

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Black Kite (talk | contribs) at 17:59, 3 September 2017 (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manifest (convention): cm). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.






Case opened

You were recently listed as a party to or recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arthur Rubin. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arthur Rubin/Evidence. Please add your evidence by 13 September 2017, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arthur Rubin/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Mkdw talk 05:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted image

File:CHINESE.jpg, which you blacklisted because it was being used by vandals the other day, has been deleted from Commons per my nomination, so it can be removed from the MediaWiki:Bad image list. Home Lander (talk) 18:24, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Avaya FAST Stacking listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Avaya FAST Stacking. Since you had some involvement with the Avaya FAST Stacking redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 (talk) 21:56, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Black Kite. I do not see a consensus for a redirect to List of anime conventions#Defunct and on-hiatus conventions. Aoziwe and I both supported retaining the page, while Knowledgekid87 and Cjhard supported deletion. No one supported a redirect. No one commented about the sources I posted. Would you clarify how you found a consensus for a redirect? Cunard (talk) 17:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Two Deletes, a Keep and a Weak Keep but the latter voting on the basis that it was not covered at List of anime conventions before being pointed out that it was. This type of AfD is always tricky but now I see someone's nominated even the redirect for deletion. You can't win, can you? Send it to DRV if you want, I won't disagree. Black Kite (talk) 17:59, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]