Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 September 22

< September 21	September 23 >

September 22

File:John Allen Williams.jpg

This looks to be a professional photograph. Could the uploader please confirm that he is indeed the photographer and explain? Thanks. Themightyquill (talk) 07:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Morris Janowitz1.jpg

This image appears to be a professional photograph. Could the uploader please confirm that he/she is the photographer and explain? Thanks. Themightyquill (talk) 07:44, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Korean Army K1A1 tank.jpg

Was deleted on Commons saying the license release wasn't valid. See c:File:Korean_Army_K1A1_tank.jpg. Orphaned as well. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 11:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:KhardungLa4A.jpg

Was marked as not Commons by a third party, but no further details provided. I am in good faith reasoning that the named photographer is the uploader. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:29, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ghedi-Stemma.png

Marked as unsuitable for Commons due to licensing issues, what licensing issues? If this is free it should be on Commons, If non-free under fair use as image is clearly in use in an article. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:33, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:IC Macroglossum stellatarum1.JPG bg-blurred.jpg

Marked as unsuitable for Commons by a third party, but I am failing to see why as the image this is derived from is on Commons without issue. The person requesting no commons on this did not provide any other reasoning apparently. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canada goose flight cropped.jpg

Image from which this is derived is at Commons without issue, so I am failing to see why a {{Do not move to Commons}} is applicable. The third party placing the tag did not provide any additional reasoning. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pingyaocannon.JPG

Who actually took the photo? This image is claimed to be joint copyright of the named parties. If both then OTRS may be needed from the other party, as there is an absence of evidence of permission on this file currently. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logitech MX-510 Blue.PNG

Marked as unsuitable for Commons, but not seeing why this is so as no additional detail was provided by the tagger. The concern I would have is do do with whats shown is entirely functional or has third party elements of industrial design. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:NGS Honorable Mention Award to THFFI.jpg

Dubious authorship claim. This seems to have been created by the National Genealogical Society and not by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 19:38, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good grief. I scanned the certificate. I am the Treasurer of The Hungerford Family Foundation, Inc. and the editor of "The Hungerford World Tree." I attended the NGS Conference where this certificate was awarded to us. Charlie (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly go to this link for verification of the authenticity of this certificate. Yes, the certificate was created by the NGS but it was awarded to THFFI. Here is the link showing the award to THFFI: https://www.ngsgenealogy.org/cs/awards_winners Charlie (talk) 20:00, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]