I know it looks pretty close right now, as a few votes in the other direction could easily swing the vote percentages. I just wanted to wish you best of luck with your RfA, and I really do hope your RfA will pass. Too many people make concerns about experience, and I really don't think that's valid anymore. I made almost 99% of my edits from June onwards, and I successfully became admin just last week. --Nishkid64 00:21, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Heh yeah. I learned a lot about myself during that week of my RfA. What was strange about my RfA was that I didn't get oppose votes based on my inexperience, but more of my response to some negative comments posted by another editor on my RfA page. It totally blew up in my face, and I realized I had to maintain my composure if I wanted to be admin. (and this was the first time on Wikipedia that I wasn't exactly civil) This doesn't really apply to you, but I just wanted to remind you because it happens to all of us. --Nishkid64 00:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't know you weren't an admin! I just tossed in my vote as well. Getting my adminship was the toughest row to hoe I've ever been through. There ain't no justice if you don't get your well-deserved promotion. - Lucky 6.9 15:18, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
ROTFLMAO! Yes! You just hit the nail on its exploding head! Lots of folks - myself included - take this whole project a bit too seriously at times. I wish you luck. It's looking good so far. I won by an overwhelming simple majority the first two times I put myself through the wringer; not quite the "consensus" they seek. Yours is looking good. - Lucky 6.9 15:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there, hope the RfA isn't stressing you out too much (although from where I'm standing, it's looking pretty darn good). — riana_dzastawreak havoc|damage report 10:59, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
LOL!!
I just blocked Tara...but if she's dead, we don't have to worry! We need a new category: [[Category:Wikipedia vandals who claim to have committed suicide over non-notability]]. I like it. :) - Lucky 6.9 02:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
thank you
Merope, Thank for you the help and speedy reply. Cheers to you, KarateLadyKarateLady 14:41, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NP Patrol
Hey, thanks for the tip. See you around. - SpLoT 16:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Haseler
I've put my question on my web page, because another person has come and that seems the best place for my question
Mike 16:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Inara BBS wiki page.
Unfortunately, I was not given enough time to modify the article in question before it was deleted. I was unable to point out how that it is, in fact, remarkable, in this day and age, for a new text based, telnet reliant BBS to form and gain popularity.
For those who are aware of the history of internet discussion groups, instant message, etc, it is obvious why this is significant. Unfortunately, the article I spent an hour writing was gone before I had the opportunity to modify the content. This is AFTER an appropriate link to this bulliten board was deleted from another wiki page, and AFTER I was threatened with permanent ban for puposeful "vandalism."
If this is supposed to be a "free encyclopedia", significance and remarkability should not be decided by one person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cg2112 (talk • contribs)
Copied to subpage of usernamespace -- Tawker 19:13, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Err, restored and moved to userspace -- Tawker 19:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicated Special Pages
Sorry! Please delete them. I was trying to find a way of securing easy and quick access to uncorrupted versions of specific articles, via special pages, but obviously this is not the way. Please delete them. Bardwell 18:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for advice! Just what I was looking for. Bardwell 18:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Black Swans speedy deletion
I created a page for the band The Black Swans and recieved a message from you stating that it was tagged for speedy deletion. I want to protest that on the grounds that they are notable because they have done multiple national tours in the U.S. and have been reviewed by numerous prominent music guides such as All Music and Pitchfork. If you could help me out with this, that would be great. Thanks! YoungRed 19:06, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I wanted to let you know that this Dr. Wilson fellow has his recreated the autobiographical article you deleted, not once, but twice: as GODWIN WILSON and Wilson, Godwin. In both of the latter cases, the content is identical, bearing more of a resemblance to a resume than an article. I tagged the 2nd article for wikification, etc., before learning that it was a repost. An AfD has been started for GODWIN WILSON, but so far no one has voted. Can they both be speedied as db-repost? He seems like a decent enough chap, but these are not articles in the strictest sense. ---Charles 19:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Are you purposely trying to cause problems?
Dear Merope,
Why did you block the Norbert H. Kox page as a copyright infringement? In other articles there were mentions of Norbert H. Kox on Wikipedia but no "page". I took the time to put up an article page for the benefit of those interested. It took a lot of time and trouble. I have the copyright of the material used and there is no infringement. You have now made it so that I would have to go through much hassle to prove it. I do not have the time to invest, so thank yourself for cheating people out of the chance to read this article. You have wrongfully blocked an article of interest, and it will soon be removed completely from the Wikipedia files thanks to you.
Blatant spam/self promotion articles are now allowed to be speedy deleted per the new CSDs. Not worth adding it to the backlog.--Andeh 17:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I saw your vandal-counter; I should add one of those. I'm up to 23 in just four weeks; I must be doing something right. (But 15 of those were from User:Randallrobinstine's sock-puppetry). -- Jim Douglas(talk)(contribs) 03:01, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Workers of the World
I am going to revert your reverts of my edits. I disagreed with your changes when you made them, but waited to see what other people thought. I think the changes were too bold, and done without consensus or consultation. Before you engage in an edit war, I suggest you post your objections here. --evrik 13:34, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I cleansed the discussion to focus it on the issue and not the participants. --evrik 15:37, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm okay with the discussion the way it is. The WikiProject Awards group is the old new again. The Awards pages started as a wikiproject, changed into wikipedia and since then has struggled to find a balance between maintenance and bureaucracy. Anyone is welcome to participate, we're trying to give the pages some continuity. --evrik 15:47, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Incorrect categorisation
You can remove categories by removing the line that says [[Category:Goods]]. However, the article you linked to is not in the category Goods. Can you show me where you see this? -- Merope Talk 13:56, 5 October 2006 (UTC
If you go to durable goods and look at the bottom of the page at the "Types of goods" box, the first item listed is the oned categorised incorrectly. Why, and how it is removed is what is puzzling me. LittleOldMe 14:14, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your help, could you please review The Bat! page, maybe there something left to edit. I have added some references there to get rid of wheasel words. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxim Masiutin (talk • contribs)
I tried to save the Collette Savard entry before it was completed. It seems by doing so it was uploaded. I will have to attempt this at another time. My apologies.-John
You're now an admin, so have fun using the new tools to keep the project improving. Use them conservatively, especially at first, and re-read policy as needed before acting. As you get comfortable, dig in and help out with the backlogs. Again, congrats, and don't hesitate to ask for help if you need it. - TaxmanTalk 02:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats, Merope. From what I learned of you during your rfa, I've been convinced you'll be a good, responsible sysop. Picaroon9288 02:15, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I know you didn't leave, I was just trying to spread the Wikilove! -- Cielomobileminor7♭5 03:07, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WOO-HOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
Welcome to the club! Heaven help the vandals now. Don't let the bastards grind you down, either. This is great news. - Lucky 6.9 05:17, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations on your new and shiny mop and bucket! :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 13:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats! I'm sure you'll be a fine admin and one of the best admin vandal fighters. Wickethewok 13:33, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations on your promotion, and you're very welcome! --Merovingian - Talk 13:34, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations on your adminship! Have fun deleting all those articles you were speedy tagging. :) NawlinWiki 13:45, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just reread your message – personal thanks? Aw, shucks! If you ever need support for anything else, lemme know! :) — riana_dzastawreak havoc|damage report 14:13, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations on your promotion! Please ask if you have any questions about adminship. Regards, (aeropagitica) 14:25, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merope, Congratuations to you! KarateLadyKarateLady 14:30, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Very cool that you became an admin 2 years to the day after your first edit. Wickethewok 15:07, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations
Well, I can't say I'm suprised. You take the time to work on major edits, and then help the little lost people like me with style, flair and compassion. Good Luck! Kathjim 15:13, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Vasectomy Wargamers Club
Why did you delete my page? (Vasectomy Wargamers Club) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calblack (talk • contribs)
Congratulations!
Big congratulations on obtaining adminship. I have no doubt that you'll do a great job! As for my trust, you already have it, along with my support should you require it in any moment.
Being an admin is tough, you do all the work, handle all the flames and disputes, and most of the time get none of the gratitude. But often, the most gratifying thing about a thankless job is the job itself. Also you have a sizable group of supporters who value you and will be there to support you should the job ever get to you, which was my concern; I'd hate to lose a good user like you to the hordes of trolls and vandals.
So once again, congrats, and keep doing a good job (because hey, you already were!). Be reading you! Roadmr 16:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
About deleteing my userpage
I do want it deleted. I forgot i had the page untill a few days ago. My girlfriend googled my name and some stuff popped up including my userpage. I don't use it at all that's why i want it deleted.Chris 17:11, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I actually feel pretty bad doing NPP, because I once tagged a page that didn't need to be, and am still wracked with guilt over it. Vandal squishing makes me happy – bloodthirsty, I know.
As for adminship – ask me in another 6000 edits, I think! I doubt I'm experienced enough. — riana_dzastawreak havoc-damage report 17:52, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thanks for blocking this schmuck, but I don't see him in Special:log/block. Am I looking in the wrong place? VoiceOfReason 17:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry, I won't hurt you. Congrats! If I'd known you were up for RfA I'd have stopped by to offer my enthusiastic support myself. May you wield the mop wisely. VoiceOfReason 17:57, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion
You've deleted a page that I created. I would like to know the reason why. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OrangePie (talk • contribs)
I assume this is referring to Michael Hardaway, which was recreated, and I've tagged for deletion again. President of a startup whose article was AFD'ed a few months back. I've left a note on user's talk page. Fan-1967 18:13, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like the anon IP on your page was the same person, as it also had edits on the Hardaway article. Fan-1967 18:14, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Re: Your RfA
Congratulations! Yeah, I decided that if I found it myself, it would be a completely different matter. So, I found it, and voiced my support. It was, and is, entirely deserved. I look forward to working together to improve Wikipedia. ---Charles 18:15, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wreckhouse
hello, i have recently written an atricle about the development of an independent studio not intended for vanity or advertising purposes. the studio i am writing about has gotten acclaim from New York City to upstate New York to New Jersey to Pennsylvania to Georgia to California and has produced many commercials and songs that get heavy radio play on local radio stations and internet radio stations all around the country. With that said i believe that article i written should not be deleted because of the volume of people that inquire about wreckhouse studios every month and your very reputable webside provides them with the perfect medium to obtain that knowledge they seek about our studios. i assure you i will never use the site to advertise or for any vanity purposes and all of the information i have submitted is 100% accurate, but i would like to elaborate a bit more on some of the information. thanks you in advace for your consideration Rudolph Anthony — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wreckhouse238 (talk • contribs)
sorry
sorry about that i left my computer unlocked and some mates made a page — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnthonyStarling (talk • contribs)
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue V - October 2006
The October 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 20:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC) [reply]
CONGRATULATIONS!!!!
Congratz to our newest admin. =) Have fun with your new powers. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. (even though I have only been at it for like 10 days lol). --Nishkid64 21:05, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
From FisherQueen
Thanks for the good advice on userpage messages- I'll start following it immediately.
In other news, I've noticed your work, too, while I was doing my little bit to help. Congratulations on your promotion.
It's cool that we have so much in common; we must be the cook kids. (Note correct use of semicolon.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by FisherQueen (talk • contribs)
Re:RFA thanks
Congrats on your adminship. Even though I "voted" neutral in your RFA, I'm glad to see that you've become an admin. I'm sure you'll do well. Just stop already with the deleting articles while I'm in the middle of marking them for speedy deletion! ;-) Heimstern Läufer 21:53, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
After I endorsed your prod of Phoon, the author contested it. Therefore, I have nominated it for deletion. Thought you'd want to know so you can weigh in. Heimstern Läufer 23:50, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
RE: Re: My RfA
Hi Merope! Thanks for the detailed comment to my participation in your RfA! I stand by my opposition for the most part, as I think that you should've been more aware of your diction and how it was probably perceived in your nomination. However, it seems as if you've been doing a lot of good work in your very short time as an administrator and I see no cause for concern (actions speak louder than words, of course). Plus, you had a lot of support from a lot of Wikipedians whose opinions I value. Given the outcome of your RfA and your work so far, it's quite obvious to me that you can be trusted with the buttons. Thanks again for the message and I look forward to seeing you around the backlogs hoopydinkConas tá tú? 05:41, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Cats
Hi. Can images have categories such as [[Category:Fruits]]? Aquafishtalk 02:13, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Can you delete the category [[Category:SpongeBob SquarePants images]] then? I'm in process of removing the cat....Aquafishtalk 02:18, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, ok. Can you revert some of my edits? Getting to work on it now...Aquafishtalk 02:30, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm too tired to do revert them tonight. Aquafishtalk 02:31, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That's O.K. We all make mistakes. How is it easier for you to do it as an admin? I'm new here btw. Aquafishtalk 02:33, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, sounds helpful. I'd like to be an admin someday. But will all the blur going on about me right now, I shouldn't do it. Thanks for your help undoing my edits. :) Aquafishtalk 02:36, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again :) I'll come to you if I ever have a question/another problem. Aquafishtalk 02:40, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Re: Dhank's talk page
Thanks for the note. I'll hold off for now.
My rationale is that he is an inactive editor except for his insistence on removing the warnings. His original activity consisted solely of promoting a software project of his (which is why he earned the warnings), and removing the warnings that he earned (which got him more warnings). I know this is in general a grey area. Given the compromise of archiving the contents of his Talk page, and considering his purpose here and consistent antisocial behaviour, I haven't had much sympathy for his pleas to have his page blanked though. Regardless, I'll hold off. — Saxifrage✎ 02:28, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good to me. Now that it's been called to my attention, too, it's easier to see that reverting was becoming more a matter of principle and habit than utility, as he indeed hasn't been doing anything but blanking.
And, tangentially, I grinned when you said "thank you" for being reasonable. As a member of the anti-spam project I've gotten used to bile in response to an instructive message, and I get the same feeling of pleasant surprise when they're reasonable that I detected in your thank-you. Thank you for your gentle tone and for doing these usually-thankless administratorly duties. — Saxifrage✎ 02:39, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Notability of professors
I disagree with your edit summary here that "professors are generally notable". That doesn't seem to apply to the article and some other professor articles I've stumbled across clearing the CSD category. They all have to teach and specialise in one discipline or another, and that's what the article basically says. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 09:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you just delete planet Katie article?
She is a very well known online model, similar to kates playground Kates Playground, just shes only been around for about 9-12 months not the 3 yrs that kate from kates playground has been around. I feel you are abusing admin rights here and just not being democratic at all. Now I've got to spend another 30 mins sorting it out again.
