User talk:C.Fred

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

Welcome to my talk page.

Please sign and date your comment (by adding ~~~~ at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page.
Please add a new thread to the bottom of the page if you wish to leave me a new message. If you're following up on a previous message, keep your comment in that same place:
- If you leave me a message here, I will reply here and {{Mention}} you here or leave a {{Talkback}} template on your talk page, unless you indicate that you are watching my page or no talkback message is necessary.
- If you are responding to a message I left on your talk page, please reply there so the discussion stays in one place. Please {{Mention}} me in the message there or leave a {{Talkback}} template here so I know about the message, unless I indicate that no talkback is necessary in my message. If you are commenting here on a message or warning I left there, don't be surprised if I move the discussion back to your talk page.
This page is set for automatic archiving every 7 days. I will remove talkback messages as acknowledgment that I have read the related reply, and I reserve the right to summarily remove any uncivil comments.

Thank you, and happy editing!

That "Persistent" Vengaboys Museum

That Vengaboys Museum appears to be Persistent... Keep a eye on the official Vengaboys wiki or Protect it and force Vengaboys Themselves to provide their ID if they want to add any new Edits to their Wiki...

First a weird page came up saying the Museum was under attack, now it has returned to normal... They must be planning something big because this recently popped up on google if you do a search for Vengaboys Museum and you check out their official facebook page and you see a ominous message about their museum creating some kind of "global domination"...

Image and Ominous Message — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.130.80.182 (talk) 22:06, 14 October 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]

This is my vikipedia dear C. Fred

Dear C Fred i am the person whose Vikipedia this is and there are some very bad things in it about me , which are absolutely false please do ask a proof from someone when they make a change about a public person and allow me to make required changes so that you can have accurate information about me and also please let me know who made these recent changes when it was said that i am a sex worker, i am an a global prize winning girls education activist sister Zeph, and this is someone who is making such stories about me, I am feeling so bad right now by looking at such words about me and my character

I missed the IP vandalism. Now I see what happened. Sorry about that. —C.Fred (talk) 18:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

re: alison

I thought she was a fictional identical twin for real. Pretty Little Liars (book series). --I Have Always Been a Twin (talk) 14:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You beat me to it ;-)

Thanks for throwing that indef block on the sock account that just popped up :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah: No problem. It's almost not sporting to block them when they make it that obvious. :) Yet it's pretty necessary to go ahead and block quickly, especially when it's a sock of a banned user. —C.Fred (talk) 03:30, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:44, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Giovanni Morelli (Designer)

Page updated! Karen at Stuart Weitzman (talk) 20:03, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Bad overlook on my part at James Burgoyne, thanks for cleaning it up. Home Lander (talk) 20:40, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan Dubrovsky

Why would you delete this page?it is confirmed by the references

@Onix14489952: Nothing in the reference showed any significance or importance, either as a musician or an actor. —C.Fred (talk) 18:51, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are links to imdb and kinlock, this is the most authoritative websites about the movie.

@Onix14489952: Just appearing in a movie doesn't make him notable. And what is kinlock? Who publishes it; how is it reliable? —C.Fred (talk) 18:57, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kinopoisk (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KinoPoisk) is the most reliable website about movies in Russia.And sorry for my English.

@Onix14489952: Who does the editorial review? I mean, if it's the Russian equivalent of IMDB, then it's only useful to prove an actor was in a movie, nothing more about them. —C.Fred (talk) 19:39, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit the staff of Yandex.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yandex)

@Onix14489952: And how are they subject experts on movies? —C.Fred (talk) 19:46, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The website people are doing,Kotor follow the movie news,actors.All editors of the site understand the movie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onix14489952 (talk • contribs) 19:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So you can recover the page?The actor is quite famous in the country and there are links to reliable sources.

@Onix14489952: No. The sources—if we accept they're reliable—don't show that the actor is in any way significant or important. Also, please sign your posts. —C.Fred (talk) 20:08, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This actor-Belarus.In my country it is quite well known.A bunch of Belarusian actors and poets there are in Wikipedia,but in your country it is not known.—Onix14489952

invitation

we request that you join the MM we stop Islamaphobic bias and encourage knowledge about Islam including on wikipedia.

@PhilosophyandIslamexpert: What is the MM? And Wikipedia already has a policy on neutral point of view; I don't feel the need to join any additional task force to continue doing that.—C.Fred (talk) 19:00, 28 October 2017 (UTC)fred we enforce that policy and we educate[reply]