Jump to content

User talk:Sulfurboy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ComputerRick (talk | contribs) at 22:29, 30 November 2017. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Please do the following when posting on my page:

1) Post new sections at the bottom of the page.

2) PLEASE LINK TO YOUR ARTICLE, I go through a myriad of pages a day, I won't know what you're talking about unless you link your article.

3) Please don't request me to re-review your article unless I've specifically asked you to do so. AfC is incredibly backlogged and someone will get to it when they can.


07:07, 17 October 2017 (UTC) review of submission Hostinger International

Good morning. FYI: article has been updated with reliable sources. Can you please have a look? Thanks.

== 23:46:25, 25 October 2017 review of submission by Aasen h ==.


Hi we have added this artists previous wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Her_Royal_Harness) to this submission. We believe this clarifies her notability. Thanks

09:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC) review of my submission by NGFrem


Hello! Thank you for reviewing my draft for "Neemat Frem" Draft:Neemat Frem. Kindly note that my name is Samer Chemaly, and I just created the account with the name NGFrem but the email associated with the account is mine samer.chemaly@mediapaklb.com, and this is not an autobiography. Appreciate providing me with more details about how to add the adequate refrences and appreciate giving me an example so I fix the article and submit it. Thank you in advance. Hopefully this time it will work. Thank you again, NGFrem (talk)

02:19:53, 30 October 2017 review of submission by Alpertuzcu



Hello,

I accidentally submitted my draft a few days ago while it was still in works. Since your decline, I have written the article now with resources, and could you please re-review it for me when you have a chance? If there's anything missing I'd be glad to fix it. Thank you

Alper

23:21:44, 13 November 2017 review of submission by Randomloves74


Not requesting a re-review, just wanted to ask if the problem with the article is that ALLBold text the quotation marks in the drafted article need to have footnotes before I can resubmit again. Just want to make sure that I have it right. Also are there other things I need to change in the article so that I will not have any not issues. Thank you

06:45:27, 21 November 2017 review of submission by AnRoCa


Dear Sulfurboy,

we adjusted our wording and added a few references. We're still trying to adapt to Wikipedia's guidelines and hope that our adjustments are going in the right direction. The new references are reliable and independent as requested and should display the notability of our organization. We also adjusted the wording and hope it fits Wikipedia's requirements. Please share your thoughts with us and let us know which further steps should be taken.

Thank you for your help.

Best regards, AnRoCa.

14:10:22, 21 November 2017 review of submission by PATRIZIA KinderHaus-Stiftung


Dear Sulfurboy,

I have added additional independent and reliable sources. Meanwhile there are eight independent sources, from which two are official federal/state sources.

Unfortunately I have no idea what else to add. How many/what kind of sources are expected?

Any hints what to do if these are all available sources?

Thank you in advance

Best regards

Wolfgang

10:55:09, 23 November 2017 review of submission by PATRIZIA KinderHaus-Stiftung


Hello Surferboy, Hopefully I do not spam you with messages. I am not sure if my last message was sent? Concerning the declined submission, I unfortunately do not understand the problem anymore.

It is true that I was lacking independent sources in the beginning. But now there are 7 independent and reliable sources. Two of the are even governmental official sites.

I have added all available sources. Can you please give me advice how to proceed?

Best regards


Hello PATRIZIA_KinderHaus-Stiftung/sandbox, maybe I can help a little. Question: schreibst du von Deutschland aus? Do you write from Germany, Augsburg? At this time you have no ideas about the rules for references and etc. First you have to study the rules. Frage bist du bei der stiftung angestellt, wirst bezahlt? Hast du deine talk page einmal gelesen und verstanden was da steht? - Question: are you employed by the foundation? Are you paid? Did you read your talk page and understood what it says? We can communicat via your talk page in German or English, maybe I can help. Best.--Maxim Pouska (talk) 09:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
PS is the text a translation of the German wiki article? Best.--Maxim Pouska (talk) 09:28, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

04:15:58, 27 November 2017 review of submission by DanielSJanik


Could you please tell me why the sourcing was inadequate and how I can provide that? Take any line and give me an example, if possible, so I can see exactly how to do this. Thank you!

The entire article is unsourced, not sure how to provide an example. I would review WP:REFB

My Submission

Hello, I have resubmitted my article, after adding to the reference page. Thank you for the "heads up" 15:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)15:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)15:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiChic (talk • contribs)

Review/help out with my article

You keep refusing approval for the article i published............can you please be more specific or help out cause i been doing exactly what you require but you keep refusing to approve EchoMusicBlog Please see what you can do.............I'M Confudsed and tired of retrying

Check out the article here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blessingmuchuu (talk • contribs) 02:27, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would review WP:NM. Sulfurboy (talk) 18:26, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lightricks / Moseron/sandbox - AfC you reviewed was main-spaced

See Lightricks (as well as Enlight Photofox and Enlight Videoleap) - I PRODed all three, however notifying due to your AfC review at User:Moseron/sandbox.Icewhiz (talk) 14:36, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like you got a handle on it at all, if you need me to comment on something specifically let me know. Sulfurboy (talk) 18:27, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Simply Southern

We are working on adding additional information to substantiate the notability. We are also working on formatting the references correctly. Please allow us to do by not deleting the work/page. Thanks

22:29:19, 30 November 2017 review of submission by ComputerRick


I added some links to the Further Reading section of the page, not knowing how to better include them for review. I believe another user copied them into the references portion of the article as well. I posted multiple articles, but it seems that these articles are being summarily dismissed. The techradar article, coming from a top 1000 site globally, (366th per quantcase.com or 727th per Alexa) in the WORLD, reviewed it as one of the 6 best free Linux firewalls of 2017, giving it an 8 out of 10, 1 higher than PfSense and on par with IPCop, both of which have articles and are not at risk of removal. They stated "An excellent and security-minded fork of the original pfSense project that offers a huge array of features". This was not a mere press release and not by a hobbyist web site. That should make it notable and worthy of inclusion by itself.

Another point that I want to demonstrate, is that PfSense is malicious and was proven to be so in the WIPO Arbitration regarding the OPNSense.com fiasco. They registered the domain the SAME DAY that the OPNSense name was filed under EU Copyright, then managed to state on the website that they created that if you install OPNSense and "When your users start complaining, it’s probably the firewall! Tell those whiny b[ ] to shut it. You’re leading technology!". The decision was that the "Panel finds that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith" by Rubicon Comms, dba Netgate of Austin, Tx, owners of PfSense.

Open Source software is not mainstream and should not have to compete with Microsoft for presence. It is a European endeavor and PfSense is an American one. It would be easy to see how an American publisher could game and manipulate the English Wikipedia site from including a European one, when their page is in German and so many relevant articles are in German, Swedish, Spanish, or French. I honestly expect that this should meet the criteria for WP:GNG with the additional articles that I've provided.

This originally stems from me attempting to include this listing in [[1]] as it states as the last sentence of the WP:GNG in another article. It has been removed and edited out because it was deemed that it must meet the WP:GNG to be discussed in another article, but that doesn't seem consistent. My only intent is for OPNSense to be included and for those who have attempted to add it to be cleared of accusations made about us being Vandals, Socks, SPAs, or having a COI.

Please review the additions of reviews from TechRadar and Infoworld, both independent pieces performing independent review of notable firewall projects and make another determination. I'm hoping that I've established notability, shown an attempt by a competitor to discredit and silence the OPNSense project, and improved WP overall. Thank you. ComputerRick (talk) 22:29, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy&oldid=812961420"