User talk:C.Fred

That "Persistent" Vengaboys Museum

That Vengaboys Museum appears to be Persistent... Keep a eye on the official Vengaboys wiki or Protect it and force Vengaboys Themselves to provide their ID if they want to add any new Edits to their Wiki...

First a weird page came up saying the Museum was under attack, now it has returned to normal... They must be planning something big because this recently popped up on google if you do a search for Vengaboys Museum and you check out their official facebook page and you see a ominous message about their museum creating some kind of "global domination"...

Image and Ominous Message — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.130.80.182 (talk) 22:06, 14 October 2017‎ (UTC)

Deletion of English Independence

Having read A7, English Independence IS an English Nationalist political party in England, and its leader is Neil Humphrey, as per its registration with the Electoral Commission. It contested Batley & Spen By-Election 2016, and will be contesting Alyn & Deeside AM (Welsh Assembly) in Feb 2018. It polled 1.2% which is the same level as UKIP. It beat Ankrit Love, whose Wiki page exists, despite only getting 34 votes (not 241). There is strong evidence of MI5 / Media manipulation in Batley', as English Independence gets almost no coverage at all. All candidates were described as 'far-right', even though 2 were from pakistan and bangladesh. References to the EI candidate are being deleted - notably the Yorkshire Post Oct 2016. Wiki's process to set-up political parties is extremely complex, as including templates, regions etc. A7 says 'Before nominating a page for speedy deletion, consider whether it could be improved, reduced to a stub, merged or redirected elsewhere, reverted to a better previous revision, or handled in some other way'. Please use these sources to create a party stub, or send the material back to me, so I may continue creating my page, which I was part way through. ----EnglishIndy — Preceding unsigned comment added by EnglishIndy (talk • contribs) 19:12, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

@EnglishIndy: I reviewed the sources and found mention neither of the EN party or the By-Elections Protests, which was the name under which the article was created. If I were to restore it to draft space, what is the name of the organization? —C.Fred (talk) 19:37, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Help

Sir if I post an article in Hindi then can I use my blog page link as an external link. what is a process to attach my blog name to my article that won't be removed by an editor? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aliscience.in (talk • contribs) 08:46, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

@Aliscience.in: You may not create an external link to your blog, period. See WP:ELNO for guidance on things that should not be linked to from articles. —C.Fred (talk) 20:12, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi C-Fred...

Last week I tried to edit my Uncle's wikipedia page and you un did my comments. Just wondering, how can you allow someone else to edit my uncles Wikipedia who clearly has malice intent? Who did this and why is it allowed in there without knowing the ENTIRE truth!?!? And not allow his niece to correct it and put in the truth? I thought Wikipedia was designed to know the truth about people and not a place to find slanderous content. My Uncle Mike is the CEO of a company with partners who are some of the biggest names in sports. Do you honestly think they would add their name to Mikes company if he “choked” a child? Thank you for your time. Please help me to allow this inaccurate content to be removed. Sydneytravers (talk) 23:31, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

@Sydneytravers: If you have a conflict of interest with a subject—which you have declared—you should not edit their article. You can request changes at the articl's talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 23:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

In this particular case, you'll need to provide other reliable sources to counter the claims—either to say that the charges were dismissed or that the case was resolved. —C.Fred (talk) 23:34, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

@Sydneytravers: To follow on: I can't judge whether the addition of the choking allegation was malicious. I can say that, unless there were more to the story, there's not enough to warrant inclusion in the article. I've already addressed why COI says that you should not be changing the article. Since the newspaper did not retract the story over the last few years, I don't see where there's any concerns on the libel standpoint. That said, at the end of the day, what was left was an allegation—no conviction and no evidence of any repercussions—made by another party, and when that's looked at under the lens of the WP:BLP policy, it shouldn't be there. So I removed it.

If you had removed only that item, the edit would have stood. However, you removed every negative comment about Vanderjagt at the same time, including mentions of missing critical field goals. That's why your edits were undone wholesale—under the lens of what you were changing, it looked like an attempt to whitewash.

That's also why I recommend editors to make requests in small chunks, so each item can be reviewed on its own merits. —C.Fred (talk) 23:50, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi C-Fred,

Firstly, thank you for removing the "choking" story and realizing that there wasnt any truth to it. Having said that, Im not sure who edited my uncle's Wikipedia. The facts are below. If you could please edit them accordingly or allow me to do, I would really appreciate it.

Mike Vanderjagt spent 4 years in the Canadian Football League and was an all pro. He was 14-14 in the playoffs, including 9-9 in the Grey Cup where he was named Most Outstanding Canadian. He also spent 9 years in the NFL, where he retired as the Most Accurate Kicker in the history of the NFL. He also retired with an NFL record 42 straight FG's made. He had 17 game winning FG's and also has the greatest season for a kicker EVER. He is also the only person to have ever led both the CFL and the NFL in scoring !

I could go on and on but my point is that he deserves to be written and recognized for all that he has accomplished and not for the negativity that someone wants to portray him as. He is on a very short list of the greatest kickers in the history of Pro Football. I would really appreciate it if you would allow me to edit is page, or if you could. Thank you. Sydneytravers (talk) 00:22, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

@Sydneytravers: Being one of the greatest kickers doesn't mean he didn't still have a slide here or there. The article needs to be written from neutral point of view, which means we include negatives as well as positives. I don't think what's in the article is grossly or unfairly negative. You're welcome to start discussion at the article's talk page to see if other editors agree that it should be removed. However, because of your conflict of interest, the community will view you as non-neutral, so you should not directly edit the article. —C.Fred (talk) 01:19, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Request

Can you please hide the revision at [1] because it is full of gross and insulting content. Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

BudhanilkanthaNepal

Can you help me how to contribute wikipedia well. I want to change some imformation of Nepal — Preceding unsigned comment added by BudhanilkanthaNepal (talk • contribs) 03:24, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

I'm keeping this thread in one place, at your talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 03:26, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

I want add politics of Nepal page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BudhanilkanthaNepal (talk • contribs) 03:30, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Alabama State Tuskegee football rivalry

I realize as it pertains to the Turkey Day Classic itself, yes Alabama State Tuskegee doesn't play each other in said classic. However, they are now playing each other again, 2017-2020. Aren't they considered rivals anyways since they started playing each other in 1901, 23 years before the Turkey Day Classic was born. Shouldn't there be a separate, Wikipedia page for Alabama State-Tuskegee the football rivalry that references the fact that most of their games was played as the Turkey Day Classic? 112.173.55.133 (talk) 12:25, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

References

Maybe. That's a question better asked at the talk page for the Turkey Day Classic to decide how to proceed with that. —C.Fred (talk) 12:37, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Could there be a footnote stating while Tuskegee no longer plays in the Turkey Day Classic, they continue to play Alabama State. The rivalry will still be there and won't be deleted on the fcs section, but with a footnote. How does that sound?112.173.55.133 (talk) 12:19, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

C fred

I don't know what u mean being a pro nitrotyoe Rupert is good and I am a street sagga Ty.Hamilll (talk) 13:00, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Replying on your talk page. Keep the thread there. —C.Fred (talk) 13:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

defamatory article about me with factual errors

Dear C. Fred: I have just tried twice to fix the defamation and factual errors in the article posted about me. If you read my edit, you would see that I was born to an Austrian mother and a Spanish father, in London, England, and that I am NOT of Croatian descent. Dejan Djokic, quoted in this Wikipedia attack (probably written by Aleksa Djilas) is a Serb nationalist and author of a biased book about interwar Yugoslavia which was panned by Ivo Banac in the journal SLAVIC REVIEW. The whole point of calling me a Croat is to suggest to the reader that I am somehow biased, by birth, against Serbs. I can assure you that being half-Austrian, half-Spanish, I have not brought any national bias to my work on ex-Yugoslavia. There are numerous additional errors of fact in the article, including about the age at which I began to experience gender dysphoria, the year in which I crossed from male to female, the languages into which my books have been translated, and the supposition that the Centre for the Study of Civil War still exists (it ended 10 years of work in 2012 and no longer exists). Also, if you read the language of the article, you will see that its purpose is not to provide objective information about me but to undermine my credibility. This is inexcusable. You suggest that I may have a "conflict of interest" here; I reply that I know the facts of my life better than anyone else and that the nastiness of the Wikipedia article is so obvious that only an idiot would not see it. Please inform me how I may post a more accurate account of my life, one with is not hostile to me and full of errors. Sabrina P. Ramet Zecevi99 (talk) 21:46, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

@Zecevi99: Please direct us to where we may find an independently published reliable source (or multiple sources) which have covered your life. Wikipedia policies put far more confidence in edited works like that than statements by subjects or parties related to them. If there are concerns about the tone of the article, you need to address them at the article's talk page or, if they're that severe, the noticeboard for biographies of living people.

Please also be advised that we currently have no way to verify your identity other than your statement. Please reconcile your statement about how people are out to "undermine [your] credibility" against the fact that we have no evidence that you're you and not one of those parties that you allege is out to undermine you. Unless you contact the volunteer response team via email and verify your identity, we have to consider that you are not who you state you are. Even if you do prove your identity, that will not give you carte blanche to edit the article. —C.Fred (talk) 22:05, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Admin page submission about my account

Thank you for your ANI notice. I have responded to the issues raised and would appreciate if AntanO would follow his own advice, and use the talk page before making any edits. He/She is preventing me from updating the page with new information and removing incorrect, and subjective information to preserve the integrity of the information on Wikipedia. I have tried to justify my edits on this users talk page but they are uncooperative and repudiated me with the statement "I'm not interested in your rationalization". This user has an ulterior motive for maintaining false information spread through discredited and out-dated sources. Kind Regards Floating Philosopher