User talk:1997kB

	; Archives ;
	2017/August; 2017/September; 2017/October; 2017/November; 2017/December; 2018/January; 2018/February; 2018/March; 2018/April; 2018/May; 2018/June; 2018/July; 2018/August; 2018/September; 2018/October; 2018/November; 2018/December;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

A page you started (India at the 2017 Asian Indoor and Martial Arts Games) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating India at the 2017 Asian Indoor and Martial Arts Games, 1997kB!

Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating this article.

To reply, leave a comment on Abishe's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Abishe (talk) 06:16, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Years new page backlog drive

Hello 1997kB, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1^st and run until January 29^th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

The total number of reviews completed for the month.
The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Atsme. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, She for Keeps, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

^{Atsme📞📧} 22:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, 1997kB - it is my understanding that when an article has issues that trigger an AfD, we remove the "reviewed" checkmark so it won't be indexed. If it survives AfD, it will be up for review again. Is that your understanding? ^{Atsme📞📧} 22:21, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Atsme: I think if a article survived AfD then why it need to review? I mean so many editor give their views in AfD and I don't think that it needs to be reviewed again and also curation tool automatically mark reviewed when we AfD an article, so it looks like tool is also designed in way that AfDed article don't need to review again. Thanks. ─ 1997 kB 11:26, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I had it all backwards 1997kB - my apologies. I conflated the process with another issue. I'm blaming the many Holiday distractions.

Self-whale... for when a trout just isn't enough ^{Atsme📞📧} 14:43, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Arancha Solis article

1997kB, I already added the suggestion that you asked me (references). Thank you very much for your info.I hope now the articule will be ok. Waiting for your response. Actorespain (talk) 16:18, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Actorespain: First of all there are two pages (1st and 2nd) you created about 'Arancha Solis'. So please don't submit both for review (I suggest you to submit this one). Secondly, you didn't changed the page as suggested, you just provided links in 'references' section, as per Wikipedia policies and guidelines you need to cite sources with content which means that, if you write "i am xyz" in article then the source related to 'i am xyz' should be provided after the 'i am xyz' line. To learn how you can do this, check out this video. If you still have any query feel free to ask. Thanks! ─ 1997 kB 16:40, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, 1997kB, thank you very much for your information. I already deleted the page 2(Arancha Solis duplicate article) and I saw the video that you recommended me and I learnt a lot and I did the changes that you suggested me. Do you think the article is correct now? Thank you very much for your time. Actorespain (talk) 17:54, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

16:46:51, 11 January 2018 review of submission by Tony.bourached

Tony.bourached (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Transmed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi1997kB,

I have taken you comments and guidance into consideration, reworked the content and submitted for the review again.

To note also I have linked the content to the Quiqup page on wikipedia, which also mentions transmed as a funding partner and the Lebanon Marathon Wikipedia page that also mentions Transmed as a sponsor.

Look forward to receiving your feedback and thank you so much for all your support.

--Tony.bourached (talk) 16:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]