User talk:Ringbang
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
[untitled]
Ringbang,
I have posted all available citeable news articles regarding Mr. Banks. All work is verifiable and not original work. Given Mr. Banks litany of legal and political troubles, I am not sure what can be done to make this article more positive, without censoring the news coverage. Any advice would be greatly appreciated!Norris.michaelj (talk) 03:38, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ANI Experiences survey
The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.
The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:
If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.
Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.
Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
[Thank you]
|
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
| For your fine contributions to Wikipedia, including starting an infobox at L'Intermédiaire des chercheurs et curieux. gidonb (talk) 05:34, 10 December 2017 (UTC) |
18:06:02, 11 January 2018 review of submission by Tatewaki
Dear colleague, could you please clarify what can be done to assure the notability of this person? Just to make sure it wasn't missed - I considered that she meets the criterion of "(c) has won significant critical attention", and the draft has links to a number of reviews (though mostly to copies of reviews rather than official archives of original publisher). Would it help if I manage to get fully accurate addressation for these reviews (e.g. issue and page numbers for the newspaper-published reviews)? Or the criterion means really massive critics, like several dozens of reviews? Tatewaki (talk) 18:06, 11 January 2018 (UTC)