Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kagen Sound

Kagen Sound

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ANYBIO the coverage is not sufficent to pass WP:GNG. Having a notable client that may or may not have bought one of his works does not help prove notability. The in depth coverage is of a local variety and not sufficient IMHO Domdeparis (talk) 17:01, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 02:06, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 02:06, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The coverage is State level and adequate. Here's a CBS article from Denver. There is also Colorado Public Radio profile already in the article. Here is a largish Associated Press profile article. AP is not local coverage, it is globally syndicated. There are weaker items like Hackaday out there as well. Notability met. Some of the primary sources should be removed though. Also note his former name is "Kagen Schaefer". 198.58.161.137 (talk) 09:44, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]