User talk:Tamfang

Dark side of the moon

Hi, because you have previously written about this subject in the past, could you please offer your views on the dispute on the article Moon, that is being discussed at Talk:Moon#Dark side of the moon, regarding the terminology of "dark side of the moon"? Thank you. —Lowellian (reply) 16:46, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of heads of state and government who committed suicide listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of heads of state and government who committed suicide. Since you had some involvement with the List of heads of state and government who committed suicide redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 18:54, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tamfang. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ref desk confusion

Not sure if you're aware, but your comment on the Math Ref Desk starting "Possibly a more interesting question: ..." was added and removed several times by different editors. Looks like it might have gotten caught up in some block evasion kerfuffle and since you're a regular there I thought I'd mention it in case you wanted to restore it from the history. Sometimes revert conflicts can get confusing and I wanted to make sure no legitimate edits got lost in the shuffle. --RDBury (talk) 01:20, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it (though I don't remember why) right after I wrote it, then an IP restored it with a reply ... what a day —Tamfang (talk) 18:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aks 2001 Film Hindi

Your name was in [View History] for [Aks 2001].

1. did Raghavan's corpse get burnt into ashes before Spirit entered Amitabh?

2. Is this [Supernatural Thriler Film] realy [Fictional] without [Happy Ending]?(73.220.163.13 (talk) 10:21, 4 February 2018 (UTC)).[reply]

1. I have no idea.

2. If you're asking whether it's really fictional: yes. If you're asking whether it really lacks a happy ending: I have no idea. —Tamfang (talk) 19:27, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that Every Indian Film needs Happy Ending.

How can this Film end without [Happy Ending]?(73.220.163.13 (talk) 19:37, 4 February 2018 (UTC)).[reply]

Is that a law in India? Most fiction has happy endings, but certainly not all. —Tamfang (talk) 20:10, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Continue

1. Have You seen [Aks Film] beucz You name Was on [View History Source]?

2. How did that Film get Produced why, How can We ignore [Aks] before [Kabhi Khushi Gam happy Ending]?(73.220.163.13 (talk) 21:17, 4 February 2018 (UTC)).[reply]

1. Have you looked at my edit? [1] Does it imply any knowledge of the film?

1a. I also made more substantial edits to Kanyakumari a few years ago. That does not imply I've visited there, or know anything about it. Many, perhaps most, of my edits on Wikipedia are not to add knowledge but to improve the presentation of what's already there.

2. I have no knowledge of its production. I do not understand the second question.

0. What do you mean by all these brackets? —Tamfang (talk) 21:49, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amitabh's [Kabhi Khushi Kabhi Gham Film] has No Ghosts. There's a Happy Ending.

1. only Problem's that [KKKG] was Produced after [Aks sad Ending], so Why did They make [Aks]?

2. How can We ignore [Aks]?

3. Is there Any other Indian Ghost Movie that has Sad Ending?(73.220.163.13 (talk) 03:18, 5 February 2018 (UTC)).[reply]

1. Why should we expect to find a causal relation between Aks and Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham..., any more than between, say, Becket and What's New Pussycat? ?

2. I can ignore both Aks and KKKG by not seeing them.

3. Probably.

These questions are senseless. —Tamfang (talk) 03:39, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1. Do You know Names of other [Indian Ghost Movies with Sad Endings]?

2. Do You know Names of [American Ghost Films with Sad Endings]?

3. Aks has Non-Sense Sad Ending ok?

4. Aks is Stuck in my Mind beucz Of the Person, who Lended Aks movie to my Hands Ok You understand?

5. I heard about [Aks 2018] so is That new Film still a Sequel to old [Aks 2001]?

6. No matter How many Times that I saw [Amitabh as an Old Man Cop] in other Movies, how Did my Mind forget about [Aks 2001] until [2017]?(73.220.163.13 (talk) 04:30, 5 February 2018 (UTC)).[reply]