Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Sultan
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep, withdrawn. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:46, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Paul Sultan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No signs of notability to be found within the article or online. London Hall (talk) 14:08, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 19:08, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 19:08, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 19:08, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. He's got at least a couple of major press books, so he's probably going to pass WP:Author.
- The disenchanted unionist, 1963, Harper and Row, reviews: [1][2][3][4]
- Labor Economics, 1957, Holt, reviews:[5][6]
- Right-to-work Laws:A Study in Conflict, 1958, reviews:[7]
That's just a quick look around.--Jahaza (talk) 16:05, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Withdrawing nomination - Per Jahaza. Thanks for finding these references, which I've missed. London Hall (talk) 20:25, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.