Jump to content

User talk:Acidgirltogo/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Arakuresacred (talk | contribs) at 03:51, 22 March 2018. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Evaluation by Arakuresacred

Spelling/grammar: Meets standard It should be "in the form of a vibrant" instead of "in the form a vibrant". Also, in the last paragraph of the main body, the sentence "And has collaborated with" is a fragment. It has no subject.

Language: Meets standard

Organization: Exceeds standard

Coding: Exceeds standard

Validity: Meets standard

Completion: Exceeds standard

Relevance: Meets standard

Citations: Exceeds standard

References: Exceeds standard

You did a great job. It goes into great detail. The research seems very thorough.


Evaluation 3/18/18 by NiciaD

Spelling/Grammar

Nearly Meets Standard

Note: Add 'the' to "with [the] center of focus in Lisbon". I don't think you need a comma after "started as a coup". Add 'ed' in "is primarily government sanction[ed]". "Out-reach" doesn't need a dash, just one word.

Language

Exceeds Standard

Note: Nice job writing about the criticism of street art without sounding like you supported one side or the other.

Organisation

Nearly Meets Standard

Note: I think that it would help readability if you added a subheading in the first portion of your draft.

Coding

Exceeds Standard

Validity

Meets Standard

Completion

Exceeds Standard

Relevance

Meets Standard

Note: Just a little thing, but I don't think you need "and all of Portugal" in the first line, since you make this clear in the next few sentences.

Sources

Meets Standard

Note: You were able to find quite a few scholarly articles on this topic and incorporate them.

Citations

Meets Standard

References

Meets Standard

Note

Great job on this, it was interesting to read about, and was definetly new information for me. Thanks, NiciaD (talk) 04:35, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Evalutaions 2/2/18 by AFHW (talk) 04:48, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Spelling/Grammar

Meets Standard

Language

Meets Standard

Note: "I would make the first introductory sentence stronger, adding details/ description words of humanisms rise in Nuremberg ===

Coding

Exceeeds Standard

Note: Good job on the blue links in your contribution. ===

Validity

Meets Standard

Completion

Meets Standard I like how your contriubtion was written in chronological order of events.

Sources

Meets Standard

Citations

Meets Standard

References

Meets Standard

Evaluation 3/21/18 by Jiayue

Spelling/Grammar

Nearly Meets Standard Some grammar mistakes.

Language

Meets Standard

Organization

Nearly Meets standard I think the organization should be more clear, for example, adding some sub-title to show the main idea of the paragraph.

Coding

Meets Standard

Validity

Meets Standard

Completion

Meets Standard

Relevance

Nearly Meets Standard I think that you should add more information about the history of Steer Art in Lisbon because in the introduction paragraph, you mention some information about that.

Sources

Meets Standard

Citations

Meets Standard

References

Meets Standard