Jump to content

User talk:Acidgirltogo/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Evaluation by Arakuresacred

[edit]

Spelling/grammar: Meets standard It should be "in the form of a vibrant" instead of "in the form a vibrant". Also, in the last paragraph of the main body, the sentence "And has collaborated with" is a fragment. It has no subject.

Language: Meets standard

Organization: Exceeds standard

Coding: Exceeds standard

Validity: Meets standard

Completion: Exceeds standard

Relevance: Meets standard

Citations: Exceeds standard

References: Exceeds standard

You did a great job. It goes into great detail. The research seems very thorough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arakuresacred (talkcontribs) 03:51, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Evaluation 3/18/18 by NiciaD

[edit]

Spelling/Grammar

[edit]

Nearly Meets Standard

Note: Add 'the' to "with [the] center of focus in Lisbon". I don't think you need a comma after "started as a coup". Add 'ed' in "is primarily government sanction[ed]". "Out-reach" doesn't need a dash, just one word.

Language

[edit]

Exceeds Standard

Note: Nice job writing about the criticism of street art without sounding like you supported one side or the other.

Organisation

[edit]

Nearly Meets Standard

Note: I think that it would help readability if you added a subheading in the first portion of your draft.

Coding

[edit]

Exceeds Standard

Validity

[edit]

Meets Standard

Completion

[edit]

Exceeds Standard

Relevance

[edit]

Meets Standard

Note: Just a little thing, but I don't think you need "and all of Portugal" in the first line, since you make this clear in the next few sentences.

Sources

[edit]

Meets Standard

Note: You were able to find quite a few scholarly articles on this topic and incorporate them.

Citations

[edit]

Meets Standard

References

[edit]

Meets Standard

Note

[edit]

Great job on this, it was interesting to read about, and was definetly new information for me. Thanks, NiciaD (talk) 04:35, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Evalutaions 2/2/18 by AFHW (talk) 04:48, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

[edit]

Spelling/Grammar

[edit]

Meets Standard

Language

[edit]

Meets Standard

Note: "I would make the first introductory sentence stronger, adding details/ description words of humanisms rise in Nuremberg ===

Coding

[edit]

Exceeeds Standard

Note: Good job on the blue links in your contribution. ===

Validity

[edit]

Meets Standard

Completion

[edit]

Meets Standard I like how your contriubtion was written in chronological order of events.

Sources

[edit]

Meets Standard

Citations

[edit]

Meets Standard

References

[edit]

Meets Standard

Evaluation 3/21/18 by Jiayue

[edit]

Spelling/Grammar

[edit]

Nearly Meets Standard Some grammar mistakes.

Language

[edit]

Meets Standard

Organization

[edit]

Nearly Meets standard I think the organization should be more clear, for example, adding some sub-title to show the main idea of the paragraph.

Coding

[edit]

Meets Standard

Validity

[edit]

Meets Standard

Completion

[edit]

Meets Standard

Relevance

[edit]

Nearly Meets Standard I think that you should add more information about the history of Steer Art in Lisbon because in the introduction paragraph, you mention some information about that.

Sources

[edit]

Meets Standard

Citations

[edit]

Meets Standard

References

[edit]

Meets Standard