User talk:Waddie96

08:15, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Zero1zero2 (talk)

Hello, this is to Waddie96's talk page

Don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

HIV

I started to edit HIV before I saw {{in use}}. So, I will hold off until you're done.

Please be aware that <b /> is invalid markup; also, the entire caption where you inserted it displays as one paragraph, so why not unwrap the paragraph and do it this way (colon inserted)

[[image:HIV Membrane fusion panel.svg|thumb|400px|'''Mechanism of viral entry''': '''1.''' Initial interaction between gp120 and CD4. '''2.''' Conformational change in gp120 allows for secondary interaction with CCR5. '''3.''' The distal tips of gp41 are inserted into the cellular membrane. '''4.''' gp41 undergoes significant conformational change; folding in half and forming coiled-coils. This process pulls the viral and cellular membranes together, fusing them.]]

As long as you're doing a big overhaul, I have another suggestion:

A negative result rules out HIV exposure, while a positive one must be followed by an HIV-1/2 antibody differentiation immunoassay to detect which is present.

I don't know what this means, but I think it means,

A negative result rules out HIV exposure, while a positive one must be followed by an HIV-1/2 antibody differentiation immunoassay to detect which antibodies are present.

—Anomalocaris (talk) 19:02, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have finished editing HIV. Just added some new information, updated some statistics and added information about treatment and cure. I am, however, finished now.

I'm not so sure about <b /> and the invalid markup as I did not add that and am not well versed in images on Wikipedia.

You can go ahead and edit the article. Your suggestion is noted and is now added.

Thanks for your patience Anomalocaris

--Waddie96 (talk) 19:21, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Oh I see what you mean, <b /> being bold, will fix it now.

--Waddie96 (talk) 19:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copypatrol

Hi Waddie96 and thank you for your interest in copyright cleanup. I was looking at some of the reports you assessed at Copypatrol, and noticed that the edit to Scots School Albury that you marked as "no action needed" contains material copied from the here and here. The source listed at CopyPatrol may not be the actual source of the prose. In this case it was obvious, at least to me ("The sense of community in our boarding houses underpins the supportive environment"), that the material was copied from the school website. I have cleaned the article and alerted the editors as to our copyright requirements. (The two IPs are likely the same person though)

Another example is N-Butanol where you state that the material was copied from another Wikipedia article but you don't state which one, and I don't see where you alerted the person who copied the content that attribution is required or where you added the attribution yourself. Please see WP:copying within Wikipedia for more information on this topic. I have added the required attribution and alerted the editor as to how to do it properly in the future.

Here's another problem: you marked Understanding Khiamniungan (now located at Draft:Understanding Khiamniungan) as "no action needed" when there's a large copyright violation from http://tuensang.nic.in/khiamniungan.html. I will check your remaining assessments when I get back from the gym. Please don't do any more of this work until you have a lot more experience on Wikipedia. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:35, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: Will do. Waddie96 (talk) 06:36, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: With regards to, N-Butanol, the user renamed the page from Butanol to N-Butanol hence the data from the page was flagged as copyright. The copyright material was actually copied from Butanol.

Apologies I was trying my best, I'm new at this and appreciate someone checking my work. I'm using Twinkle but am interested in other programs and ways that'll make my copyright checking more accurate. Maybe you could help me? I don't want to feel as though my work isn't valued albeit I made a few mistakes. Your assistance would be appreciated. Waddie96 (talk) 06:46, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmation's in progress

Dear Waddie96, thank you for your message but I think you're not right beause I have not committed any copy violations because first I have indicated the sources from its official website which can be seen in the references so it was not copied or pasted word by word and on the other side the Hungarian Historical Society asked me for creating wikipedia article in English as well so it allowed me to use the text of the Hungarian Historical Society freely. I have indicated on its talk page that the confirmation's in progress. The text in the article in question is not unlisenced, and I am sending the permission To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org to prove this claim.Borgatya (talk) 19:06, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Borgatya: Hi, the selected publications were copy/pasted from http://www.tortenelmitarsulat.hu/egyeb/pdf/kiadvanyok.pdf in Hungarian, though it appears the .pdf that had the copyrighted material is now inaccessible and I have tried to {{wayback}} to no avail. My request was that if you could please edit this text to avoid using copy/pasted data from the above-mentioned website and translate the Hungarian text to English as this is an English article. If you do not do this, I will have to WP:AGF revert as per WP:COPYVIO and you will have to add your publications with Hungarian text at Magyar_Történelmi_Társulat. We at Wikipedia would love it though if you could include these publications without copyright material in English on the page Hungarian_Historical_Society. Waddie96 (talk) 20:56, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Borgatya: Please correct the copy vio as per WP:COPYVIO on Hungarian_Historical_Society. During this time please keep the {{copypaste}} notice up. Ping me when you have done so so I can make a decision whether the copyright violation should be enforced or retracted. Thank you and kind regards. Waddie96 (talk) 21:22, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry if you cannot understand that I have not committed copyviolation because it is only a publication list whose titles can be translated but it is not a problem, a mistake if any publication lists are not translated into English and these publication lists are of course similar to the main source so I think you misunderstand the copyviolaton rule because ONLY TEXTS WORD BY WORD can cause copyviolation, but pasting a similar list cannot but I DO NOT want to quarrel with you and I delate all the publacation lists and I only mention the types of publications that were published in the Society and if the permission had accepted, I will add this list to article I hope you accept my decision and I delate the copyvio template.Borgatya (talk) 23:56, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammad Rashid (footballer)

Hi Waddie96, I wanted to let you know that I have just removed the CSD A7. Being a player in a first division national football club is sufficient claim of significance. The article may be tagged for improvement of references. Failing that and in the case of failing notability, this may have to go the AfD route. If you have any questions, pls let me know. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 07:52, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, same goes for M.M. Murugappan. Pls check the guidance notes Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:06, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

my first edit List of Royalty by Net Worth- please help

Hi Waddie96 - i'm just responding to your message that my edits have been undone because of 'verifiability' issues. However, the reason for the edits is because the whole article has verifiability issues (it's based on one 8 year old article in Forbes that has no sources itself). Also Ahmed Saeed's wealth was based on 2 tabloid news articles with also no source. 3 people on the list have died or abdicated! Can you advise what the right/best thing to do it? I'd like to nominate the page for deletion if there isnt a way to edit it within guidelines. thanks for your guidance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zero1zero2 (talk • contribs) 08:12, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]