Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gloor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that it should become a standard surname page. (non-admin closure) Szzuk (talk) 08:38, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gloor[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as non-notable family name and unsourced, personalized background. Wikipedia is not a genealogy site per se. Quis separabit? 00:56, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. samee converse 02:50, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - but only if pruned back ruthlessly to make a standard surname page: there are enough "X Gloor" articles (5) to justify it in that form. I agree entirely about the NN genealogy. Eustachiusz (talk) 14:05, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and overhaul per Eustachiusz. There be enough Gloors in them thar hills to make a decent surname page. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:55, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.