Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asuka Yūki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Asuka Yūki[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, industry publicity materials, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO / WP:NACTOR. No significant awards or notable contributions to the genre. Being arrested for indecent exposure is an insufficient claim of significance.

First discussion in 2008 closed as no consensus. The subject has not become more notable since then, while PORNBIO has been significantly tightened. I believe it's a good time to revisit. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:43, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Not notable for the right reasons, but the arrest for indecent exposure was covered widely in the international press. Hence: WP:GNG. I don't think you can claim that the arrest is insufficient claim of significance.Ross-c (talk) 11:46, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the arrest for indecent exposure was covered widely... makes it WP:BIO1E situation, or more likely, BIO-Zero-E since the event itself is non notable. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:03, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:07, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:07, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:07, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet notability requirements.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:51, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:23, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Nothing comes up for her English name - Her Japanese name brings up this (which judging by the image on the Google News result is wholly irrelevant anyway), The !Keeper states " the arrest for indecent exposure was covered widely in the international press" yet has provided 0 references to back that up, Easily fails PORNBIO and most importantly GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 18:39, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Negligible reliable substantive coverage. Virtually every news story in the Internet age receives "international", except the most basic local stories, and that isn't enough to even indicate notability. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 21:29, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.