User talk:Amarkov/Archive 2

[insert signature bot name] is turned off on my talk page. Feel free not to sign your comments if you don't want to.

This is an archive of my talk page.

If you want to leave a message, please go to my main talk page. I am keeping this page for archival purposes, so please do not edit it.

Pokemon Diamond/Pearl

Keep up the good work. :) Sketch-The-Fox 01:13, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. -Amarkov ^babble 01:20, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, we feel your pain. Tennis Dynamite 18:10, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Please do not remove the AfD on the Pacifilog Jam episode, the nominator didn't actually know those articles existed, so he going to check them out. I'm just helping him. those articles are under alot of vandalism recently. Please keep the AfD on the article. Pokeant (02:03, 28 October 2006 (UTC))[reply]

No. It does not matter if he is going to check them out. The AfD does not include them, so it does not get an AfD notice. They are not meant to be used as placeholders in case of a possible AfD. -Amarkov ^babble 02:05, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scammer in RuneScape

Nice job reverting that guy. I've started a topic at Talk:RuneScape about what we should do about it. CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 04:07, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. -Amarkov ^babble 04:08, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Great job on reverting that very inappropriate vandal. You deserve a star! Ed^{I'm lonely, talk to me} _contribs 19:53, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

*pokes star* Shiny. -Amarkov ^babble 19:54, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You like string theory?

You are also an atheist, right?

Well, if you like strings, go to Luboš Motl's blog. Luboš Motl called himself a "Christian atheist" (see [[this page]http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A1ZDPQA6FLY8XM])

My God, that is the most blatantly false thing I have ever SEEN. These people could save themselves a lot of trouble and just say "DIE EVIL MUSLIMS, CHRISTIANITY PWNS J00!". -Amarkov ^babble 15:51, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I'm Catholic. -Amarkov ^babble 15:51, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think there is more evidence for Misty being atheist, or Misty having a crush on Ash? Well, maybe the writers want to portray Misty as an atheist, but they never say it directly. I think the same is true regarding Pokéshipping.4.232.171.33 15:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter what you think if you don't have reliable sources to cite. -Amarkov ^babble 15:31, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gee, watch the entire anime. She doesn't practice religion at all! The anime is the source. 4.232.171.33 16:15, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then. She obviously is open to cannibalism, since she never protests against cannibalism. -Amarkov ^babble 20:03, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fine! You win... I realized that this issue is waste of time. Fine, just because no one in the anime practices religion does not make it an atheistic cartoon. I just got carried away with my atheism and my obessession with Pokémon. Just leave stuff on the talk page to see what stupidity this leads to ok :

4.231.167.105 01:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Girl Talk EP

Hey, I was wondering why you think the Girl Talk EP Bone Hard Zaggin isn't notable and deserves deletion.--PlanetSurfer 16:20, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because most of the google hits come from Bone Hard Zaggin, and when I try to eliminate results for that song, I get only 390 hits, some of which still seem to be for it. -Amarkov ^babble 16:27, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't a song, it's the title of the EP. I understand that most people searching for "Bone Hard Zaggin" on Google are looking for the Big Mello album, but there are people (like me) who are searching for info on this Girl Talk EP as well. I'm having trouble understanding though why it needs to be removed from Wikipedia. Why can't fans of Girl Talk's music be able to look up information about this EP on Wikipedia? And what do you mean by saying you're trying to "eliminate results" on google?--PlanetSurfer 16:42, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to filter out results irrelevant to your EP, and I got very few. -Amarkov ^babble 20:02, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hiram T. Smith

Marking and deleting my article on Hiram T. Smith so soon after creation without giving me a reasonable change to justify its staying as an article isn't only unfair, doesn't it go against the official policy of speedy delete criteria? Namely the marking of new articles and the non notables non criteria section? Kraagenskul 17:44, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did not delete the article. If it got deleted, that means an admin saw it and agreed with me. Besides, there is no rule against marking of new articles. -Amarkov ^babble 20:04, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize then; I thought you deleted it. I also realize I should've originally started the article as a stub and in my user's box. It was my first real item that I tried to write. Kraagenskul 01:17, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

db-rediruser

Very useful tag. A lot of times you see a vanity article (especially when, as in this case, the title exactly matches the username) that would be appropriate as a user page, and may well have been meant as one. So, you just Move it to the user page, tag the old one as db-rediruser, and leave the user a welcome with the {subst:userfied|articlename} to let them know it's been moved. Fan-1967 21:17, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I need to read the speedy deletion criteria more carefully, if I missed this one. -Amarkov ^babble 21:19, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on the Collaboration Project

I hear you are the person to thank for the quality of Pokemon reference on wikipedia. I love the sound of the PCP, getting every section up to standard. Can anyone join? Anyway, hats off sir!!! Stuedgar 01:36, 30 October 2006 (UTC)Stuedgar[reply]

Yes, anyone can join. But who told you to ask me? I'm one of the newer members. -Amarkov ^babble 02:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

my friend josh had seen your talk page. Where do i help out? Stuedgar 11:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC) stuedgar[reply]

Here. -Amarkov ^babble 15:06, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy candidate

Regarding [1] I removed the tag, not the author in question. JoshuaZ 04:42, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then. Didn't matter, anyway. Sorry if you care, though.-Amarkov ^babble 04:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, that was more a minor FYI, also to make it clear for the record in case it became relevant with new user at all. JoshuaZ 04:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crown Fried Chicken

RE: CROWN FRIED CHICKEN

Hi, I would like to know if Kentucy Fried Chicken has its own article...why can't Crown Fried Chicken create an article of its own? Crown is a fast-food restaurant chain all across the east-coast of the United States. Also to mention, there is an article about Crown's sister chain Kennedy Fried Chicken. NisarKand 09:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For something to have its own article, it must be the subject of multiple reliable secondary sources. Since you cited none, it is assumed that they do not exist. If they do, by all means, add them in. -Amarkov ^babble 05:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Im going to ask you politely..

To stop it.--Nikki666a666 00:43, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are going to have to be more specific. Although if this involves speedy tagging an article, the answer is probably no. -Amarkov ^babble 00:43, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

regarding your thoughts on the Brad Hines entry:

If you Google various combintations of Brad Hines and Bradford Hines (Having two names automatically dilutes the presence in two) yields countless entries on Hines like if you google "Hines Yum Domains" or "Hines Domains"

Check it out.--Utzchips 04:16, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]