User talk:UnsungKing123
August 2018
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:56, 8 August 2018 (UTC)UnsungKing123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand why I was blocked, and I've learned to stop doing it.
Decline reason:
This doesn't address the reason for your block at all. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:45, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
UnsungKing123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I will stop vandalizing Morgan Spurlock and Super Size Me articles, since I was harming those pages by adding false, defamatory information to them. I don't know if I will edit once (or if) I am unblocked, but I will stop editing those articles and creating sleeper accounts. I apologize for what I have done.
Decline reason:
Your behavior was extremely disruptive and deceptive towards the community. The standard offer in cases like this is to wait six months without any kind of sock puppetry or block evasion, and then if you wish to return to editing, appeal the block then using this account. Mz7 (talk) 06:46, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- @Mz7: I understand that my behavior was extremely disruptive, but a question, how was it deceptive? I will wait 6 months to appeal again, but I'm just curious how it was deceptive. Just curious, dude. UnsungKing123 (talk) 17:10, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- Using multiple accounts to disrupt Wikipedia without telling anyone that the accounts were yours is deceptive, especially when you professed that you were leaving Wikipedia with your main account. That was a lie. Mz7 (talk) 17:22, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- OK, fair enough. UnsungKing123 (talk) 18:23, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- Using multiple accounts to disrupt Wikipedia without telling anyone that the accounts were yours is deceptive, especially when you professed that you were leaving Wikipedia with your main account. That was a lie. Mz7 (talk) 17:22, 11 August 2018 (UTC)