User talk:51.7.23.71

October 2018

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 15:26, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

51.7.23.71 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I encountered editors disruptively reverting, and attempted to engage with them. But they clearly wanted to act disruptively; I did not. Note the bad faith use of noticeboards by User:Binksternet: a false claim of vandalism here, and a false claim of sockpuppetry here, both in reference to my edits, in pursuit of an edit war that they wanted, not me, to insert links to German-language articles into a list. I do not think they even understood what they were reverting. It's obvious that when a reader clicks on a blue link in an article, they expect to be taken to an English language article, not a German one. 51.7.23.71 (talk) 15:36, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I encountered editors disruptively reverting, and attempted to engage with them. But they clearly wanted to act disruptively; I did not. Note the bad faith use of noticeboards by [[User:Binksternet]]: a false claim of vandalism [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=prev&oldid=863860290 here], and a false claim of sockpuppetry [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&diff=prev&oldid=863860312 here], both in reference to my edits, in pursuit of an edit war that they wanted, not me, to insert links to German-language articles into a list. I do not think they even understood what they were reverting. It's obvious that when a reader clicks on a blue link in an article, they expect to be taken to an English language article, not a German one. [[Special:Contributions/51.7.23.71|51.7.23.71]] ([[User talk:51.7.23.71#top|talk]]) 15:36, 13 October 2018 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I encountered editors disruptively reverting, and attempted to engage with them. But they clearly wanted to act disruptively; I did not. Note the bad faith use of noticeboards by [[User:Binksternet]]: a false claim of vandalism [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=prev&oldid=863860290 here], and a false claim of sockpuppetry [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&diff=prev&oldid=863860312 here], both in reference to my edits, in pursuit of an edit war that they wanted, not me, to insert links to German-language articles into a list. I do not think they even understood what they were reverting. It's obvious that when a reader clicks on a blue link in an article, they expect to be taken to an English language article, not a German one. [[Special:Contributions/51.7.23.71|51.7.23.71]] ([[User talk:51.7.23.71#top|talk]]) 15:36, 13 October 2018 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I encountered editors disruptively reverting, and attempted to engage with them. But they clearly wanted to act disruptively; I did not. Note the bad faith use of noticeboards by [[User:Binksternet]]: a false claim of vandalism [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=prev&oldid=863860290 here], and a false claim of sockpuppetry [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&diff=prev&oldid=863860312 here], both in reference to my edits, in pursuit of an edit war that they wanted, not me, to insert links to German-language articles into a list. I do not think they even understood what they were reverting. It's obvious that when a reader clicks on a blue link in an article, they expect to be taken to an English language article, not a German one. [[Special:Contributions/51.7.23.71|51.7.23.71]] ([[User talk:51.7.23.71#top|talk]]) 15:36, 13 October 2018 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

---