Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Llewellyn Worldwide

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:08, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Llewellyn Worldwide

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant independent coverage (in provided references or through my own search), so fails WP:CORP. Wqwt (talk) 20:31, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 22:19, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 22:19, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 22:19, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 12:00, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 16:04, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- Despite nom's assertions there is sufficient independent significant coverage to establish GNG passage. For instance:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.