User talk:Testpored

Overall tennis records article name

Hi I noticed sometime ago you changed this template https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Tennis_records_and_statistics&diff=651852350&oldid=649120056 to All Time when I created that article it was called Tennis records of All Time - Men's Singles which I thought was a more appropriate name then along comes an editor (one time only btw) who moved and renamed it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Overall_tennis_records_%E2%80%93_men%27s_singles&diff=prev&oldid=588671507 personally have never liked the name overall even though it sort of means the same thing whats your thoughts?--Navops47 (talk) 06:45, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, "All time" is the better name. That's what sports commentators and fans always say and write (not just tennis but any sport I'm familiar with). I don't think I've ever heard or read all-time records refered to as "overall". So, yes, when I reorganized the template last year I used the term "All-time" without even thinking about it. -Testpored (talk) 17:07, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I happened to notice this conversation. So you're saying the article would best be called "Tennis records of all-time - men's singles" or perhaps better "All-time tennis records - men's singles"? I was never fond of "overall" either." Maybe some don't like the term "all-time?" so it could always be "Historical tennis records - men's singles." Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:39, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"All-time tennis records - X" reads the best to me. I think "historical" is too vague. -Testpored (talk) 00:42, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consecutive sets won overall

I can't add this table without making a mess in the whole page in the Open era men's singles records --Bry17may (talk) 02:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added it now. Thanks for doing that research. -Testpored (talk) 14:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Slam leaders

Hi, in List of Grand Slam related tennis records#Chronological titles leaders you edited that Renshaw led the slam count for only 5 years, until 1887, which is wrong. In addition to those 5 years, he also led (together with Sears) from 1889 until 1925, when Tilden won his 8th title. Sears was not the sole leader from 1889-1925; he and Renshaw were tied at 7 slams that whole time. Gap9551 (talk) 18:14, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And Federer was tied with Sampras for a month, Sampras with Emerson for a year, etc. -Testpored (talk) 20:32, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Grand Slam related tennis records

Would you care to explain what's going on? Format seems OK with my edits but perhaps there's somethign I'm overlooking? --Loginnigol 23:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

This table was not changed properly. I fixed it, seeing that the col-float approach is better overall when fullscreen width. -Testpored (talk) 21:31, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Testpored. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]