Talk:Critical Reviews in Toxicology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Untitled

After addition of information about impact, total citations and the editor (including references), the article is no stub anymore. --Shisha-Tom (talk) 15:17, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Predatory and pseudoscientific character

Just to open a debate to end "edit war" and build consensus on this question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scientificrigor12 (talk • contribs) 18:24, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What debate? You're not giving any arguments... --Randykitty (talk) 18:27, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Professor George arguments are based on reliable sources and his article is well documented. What are your arguments to prove that this journal is a peer-reviewed journal ?

https://www.professeur-alexandre-georges.info/tf-file-translation

--Scientificrigor12