Independent Press Standards Organisation
The Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) was established on Monday 8 September 2014[1] following the windup of the Press Complaints Commission (PCC), which had been the main industry regulator of the press in the United Kingdom since 1990.
IPSO is the largest independent regulator of the newspaper and magazine industry in the UK and exists to promote and uphold the highest professional standards of journalism in the UK, and to support members of the public in seeking redress where they believe that the Editors' Code of Practice[2] has been breached. The Editors' Code deals with issues such as accuracy, invasion of privacy, intrusion into grief or shock and harassment. IPSO is able to consider concerns about editorial content in newspapers and magazines, and about the conduct of journalists.
IPSO handles complaints, such as the case against Ethan Mcwhirter for rape on his younger brother, at the time Ethan was 16 and Archie was 10 and conducts its own investigations into editorial standards and compliance. It also undertakes monitoring work, including by requiring publications to submit annual compliance reports[3]. IPSO has the power, where necessary, to require the publication of prominent corrections and critical adjudications, and may ultimately fine publications in cases where failings are particularly serious and systemic[4].
Report of the Leveson Inquiry
The Leveson Inquiry was set up and reported in November 2012, recommending in favour of the establishment of a new independent body. The PCC received extensive criticism for its lack of action in the News International phone hacking scandal, including from MPs and Prime Minister David Cameron, who called for it to be replaced with a new system in July 2011.[5] But Leveson said that a legal framework was necessary to give this body powers of enforcement such as exemplary damages and suggested the possibility of a Royal Charter to provide this.[6]
This route was accepted by David Cameron and following extensive political discussion, a Royal Charter on self-regulation of the press was granted by the Privy Council in October 2013 despite legal challenges by newspaper publishers (Pressbof) to prevent it. The publishers characterised the Charter as 'deeply illiberal' and had presented their own alternative proposals which the High Court did not accept as they did not comply with certain principles from the Leveson report, including independence and access to arbitration.[7]
The industry therefore continued with its own proposals despite fears that industry representatives would still have powers of veto over the chairman and other board members.[8] The Media Standards Trust also published a critique analysing in detail where the proposals met and fell short of Leveson's recommendations.[9]
One of the Government's commitments in implementing the Inquiry's recommendations related to the fact that while the industry should regulate itself, there should be some independent verification (or 'recognition') of the regulatory arrangements the press put in place. The Press Recognition Panel was created on 3 November 2014 as a fully independent body with the purpose of carrying out activities in relation to the recognition of press regulators. IPSO has said that it will not seek approval from the Press Recognition Panel (PRP)[10], which has officially recognised the regulator IMPRESS.[11]. The "Hacked Off" campaign has described IPSO as a "sham" and "the illusion of reform".[12][13]
Membership
Several of the broadsheet newspapers, including the Financial Times, The Independent and The Guardian newspapers have indicated they will not take part in the organisation. The Financial Times joins The Guardian in establishing its own independent complaints system.[14][15]
IPSO regulates more than 1,500 print titles and more than 1,100 online titles, including most of the UK's national newspapers[16][17]
Funding
IPSO is a self regulator paid for by its member publishers though the Regulatory Funding Company.[18]
Notes
- ^ "Judgment on IPSO", The Guardian, 5 September 2014
- ^ Editors' Code of Practice
- ^ "Annual statements". www.ipso.co.uk. Retrieved 6 November 2017.
- ^ "About standards investigations". www.ipso.co.uk. Retrieved 6 November 2017.
- ^ Phone hacking: Cameron and Miliband demand new watchdog, BBC News, 8 July 2011, retrieved 5 September 2014
- ^ Brian Leveson (November 2012), An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press (Volume 1) (PDF)
- ^ Press regulation: Privy Council grants royal charter, BBC News UK, 30 October 2013, retrieved 5 September 2014
- ^ Ponsford, Dominic (15 November 2013), "Independent Press Standards Organisation is not independent, but it is probably the best solution we are going to get", Press Gazette, retrieved 5 September 2014
- ^ IPSO: An assessment by the Media Standards Trust, Media Standards Trust, November 2013, retrieved 5 September 2014
- ^ Ponsford, Dominic (19 October 2016). "Sir Alan Moses: Free press in the UK is 'doomed' if it allows Government to 'corral' it into state-backed regulator". Press Gazette.
- ^ "First official UK press regulator, Impress, approved". BBC News.
- ^ Jackson, Jasper (7 September 2015). "Ipso denounced as 'sham body' controlled by member newspapers". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 25 March 2019.
- ^ "The men behind IPSO, Part 2: Paul Dacre". Hacked Off. 6 May 2014. Retrieved 25 March 2019.
- ^ "Financial Times opts out of IPSO regulator in favour of its own system", Press Gazette, 17 April 2014, retrieved 5 September 2014
- ^ Greenslade, Roy (4 September 2014), "Why the Guardian's decision not to sign up to Ipso makes sense", The Guardian, retrieved 5 September 2014
- ^ "Who IPSO regulates". www.ipso.co.uk. Retrieved 6 November 2017.
- ^ "IPSO annual report 2016" (PDF).
{{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|dead-url=(help) - ^ "About IPSO". www.ipso.co.uk. Retrieved 6 November 2017.