User talk:ArcusLordOfGods

March 2019

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Acroterion (talk) 12:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

==

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

ArcusLordOfGods (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was abused by an admin.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was abused by an admin. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was abused by an admin. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was abused by an admin. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

==

In March I stated pretty simply that by doing my own research and reading every three thoroughly on the Fascism Wiki-page, I found that there was no correlation to the Left-Right Wing spectrum. Someone informs me that although I believe the problem is due to political bias, nothing can be changed without an artical or publication from an author. Then, I get blocked from editing and accused of being a sock puppet for Stormcloak Ethnonationalist without ANY EVIDENCE on the Admin's part. They never contacted me or anything and there is no proof on their part that I am guilty of anything. I have done just as the Wiki policy asks and gave my say without being rude or disrespectful. I did not pursue the argument, just as the Wiki policy asks of us. And yet here I am, unjustly banned because one of the Admins doesn't like other people's opinions. I am going to cancel my subscription, because why should I pay for a website that abuses its power to silence those who would question its actions? Kinda sounds like Fascism to me, but what do I know? ArcusLordOfGods (talk) 06:40, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]