User talk:Kautilya3
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Please comment on Talk:Fascism in Europe
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fascism in Europe. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Christchurch mosque shootings
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Christchurch mosque shootings. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:SNC-Lavalin affair
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:SNC-Lavalin affair. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:MS-13
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:MS-13. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
You are most welcome sir.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:42, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Ronna McDaniel
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ronna McDaniel. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Indo-European migrations
From your comments on the Talk page of this article, it appears that you consider that you are in some sort of dispute with me. I have no idea what this dispute is supposed to be about. Sweet6970 (talk) 12:18, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- I don't know if there is a dispute, but I would say that your intervention there did not help. The right thing to do is to ask for a policy-based debate, if there is any, and shut down WP:FORUMy discussions. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:30, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- The discussion was about the wording of the article, as to whether it was neutral. It was not a discussion about the actual subject of the article. Sweet6970 (talk) 12:42, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- Perhaps so. But the wording reflects the sources. If the sources were misrepresented, then that needs to be established. If there are other sources that contradict the content, they can also be brought forward. That is what an NPOV debate means. But claims like "I don't believe this wording is neutral" are pure WP:OR and disruptive. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:57, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- The discussion was about the wording of the article, as to whether it was neutral. It was not a discussion about the actual subject of the article. Sweet6970 (talk) 12:42, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Caste system in India (continued from Archived discussion)
>> I am continuing the discussion on caste/jati from archived discussion..which i cannot comment on >>
Hi Kautilya, Please explain how Jati is more nuanced than caste...with references (I am not talking about what caste meant to portugese or english. I am talking about what caste means to indians). And then please add that to the section explaining why u dont want to equate it to caste (with references) & i can add a section explaining why i think both are same. Let the readers decide on the point/argument that appeals on them. In colloquial usage in tamil, both words mean the same. For common references like wikipedia, mentioning this important...imho.
Thanks for ur time. Regards.
Thanks
for this. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:David_Frawley&diff=898228437&oldid=898034601 Weird allegations. ∯WBGconverse 07:06, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, it looked like an attack-account. Probably best to delete the ramblings and forget about them. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 08:10, 22 May 2019 (UTC)