Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Glendinning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Scott Burley (talk) 23:19, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Al Glendinning

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject certainly fails WP:NHOCKEY as a player, with only 21 games in the AHL and 119 games in the IHL and with no preeminent honours to speak of. BUT, if his coaching career establishes notability I will withdraw the nomination. Tay87 (talk) 22:42, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 22:42, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 22:42, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 22:42, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 22:42, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete Doesn't have the coverage to meet the GNG. Being coach of the year in a Canadian junior league is not enough to meet WP:NHOCKEY and I don't see anything else that supports notability.Sandals1 (talk) 14:59, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Have to agree with the above. Barca (talk) 19:04, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet our absurdly broad inclusion criteria for hockey players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.