Jump to content

Talk:Attacus atlas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AnnaComnemna (talk | contribs) at 14:36, 23 August 2019 (→‎Wing area error.: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconLepidoptera Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Lepidoptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of butterflies and moths on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

In Brazil?

So, I see that the line about these moths being found in Brazil has been added and removed multiple times. It does not have a source for that info, and I am skeptical that this creature would be found in SE Asia and Brazil as well, unless it is an introduced species, which the article does not mention. Can someone clarify? I personally am in favor of removing the statement if it cannot be verified Wcbpolish (talk) 13:17, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it is true that it lives in Brazil, going by the book, without any verification it should be removed. But I also doubt that it is true. JamesDouch (talk) 07:02, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wingspan

First Their wingspans are also amongst the largest, from 25–30 cm (10–12 in)., but then A record specimen of Attacus atlas from Java measured 262 mm
It is claimed to have maximum 30 cm span, and then said that record is 26.2 cm. Doesn't fit. 85.217.44.72 (talk) 17:37, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wingspan - male vs female

"Their wingspans are also amongst the largest, reaching over 25 cm (10 in). Females are appreciably larger and heavier." -- The males reach over 25cm and the females are appreciably larger? Or, the females reach 25cm and the males are appreciably smaller? It's a little unclear. And why "over" 25cm? How much over? 26cm? 30cm? Isn't there some sort of accepted range that's a little more specific? Humans can reach over 2 meters tall, but that's not really an accurate description of average human height. JBarta (talk) 01:39, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How common are they?

Are they pretty common or vulnerable or endangered or.....? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.119.151.233 (talk) 04:56, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Attacus atlas qtl1.jpg to appear as POTD soon

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Attacus atlas qtl1.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on August 3, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-08-03. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:47, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Atlas moth
The Atlas moth (Attacus atlas) is a large saturniid moth found in the tropical and subtropical forests of Southeast Asia, and common across the Malay Archipelago. Considered the largest moth in the world in terms of wing area, the species shows considerable sexual dimorphism, with females such as the specimen pictured here generally much heavier than males.Photo: Quartl

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Attacus atlas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:42, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Attacus atlas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:12, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wing area error.

The current article states "... a wing surface area of about 400 cm2 (62 in2) ... surpassed by the Hercules moth (Coscinocera hercules)." The current Coscinocera hercules article states "...its wings have the largest documented surface area (300 square centimeters)... ! AnnaComnemna (talk) 14:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]