Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DM Ashura

DM Ashura

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

DM Ashura is a Bemani fan known for making remixes of songs. A few of his songs are now in DDR, but I don't think that makes him "notable". In any case, unless Konami included a short bio in the Ultramix 4 booklet, I don't think anything but the fact that he made these songs is verifiable. --SPUI (T - C) 02:17, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: After discussion with the creator of the page and some improvement, I think the page is looking better. Moogy^(talk) 03:48, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:MUSIC A musician or ensemble (note that this includes a band, singer, rapper, orchestra, hip hop crew, DJ, musical theatre group, etc.) is notable if it meets any one of the following criteria:
5. Has been featured in multiple non-trivial published works in reliable and reputable media (excludes things like school newspapers (although university newspapers are usually fine), personal blogs, etc.). <---02Jam and Dance Dance Revolution Ultramix 4.
9. Has won or placed in a major music competition. <---Broadjam Contest mentioned on the page. MarsPhoenix 02:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect to Dance Dance Revolution ULTRAMIX 4. Googling DM Ashura, as far as I can tell, turns up only one verifiable fact about DM Ashura: that he has a song on DDR Ultramix 4. That fact does not merit an entire article, and is expressed just fine in the DDR Ultramix 4 page. --Hyperbole 02:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

comment Search for the BroadJam and 02Jam stuff. It's there. MarsPhoenix 03:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go here for proof of my song in O2Jam, please note the DTX information is outdated though. Go here for proof of the Broadjam contest. Also, is an artist's official webpage reliable as a source for notability? Bill Shillito 03:19, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

'Fraid not, Bill, because it doesn't represent an independent (i.e. unconnected to the subject of the article) source. For more info on what would work, see WP:V and WP:RS. The problem is, the only place your music is really mentioned in significant sources of any kind is just mentions that it's appeared in these two music games, which is not really enough for an article. (And to User:MarsPhoenix, the line in WP:MUSIC about appearing in multiple non-trivial published works is referring to being mentioned in something like a newspaper article, not having their own work released in a game or on an album). Unfortunately, I'm not sure if even the BroadJam piece qualifies, because as it stands I can't actually find much evidence for notability of BroadJam itself (it doesn't even have its own article yet, but I'm not dismissing the possibility that the notability is there but no-one's written the article yet). Confusing Manifestation 03:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My argument as for the "major"ness of the music contest is that the winners were featured in what is possibly the most well-known and best-selling music game franchise in the world. Here's another link to the contest from a Konami page: DDR Contest As for appearing in music games, is there a number of music games that would be "enough" for an article, considering some other artists in the "Bemani music" category? Bill Shillito 04:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

comment Third party sources indicating notability, in this case, need to be something other than your own creation (a personal website), a DDR official, or Konami feature. If you had a Third Party, by that criteria, review, award, or mention of another reputable or notable source then that would satisfy the requirements. -- wtfunkymonkey 05:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
comment for the time being I am going to abstain from voting, until more arguments are made and I have a chance to research more. [1] is approaching the type of material needed, but the IGN article itself does nothing to attest to you or your song's notability. Something indicating your material's uniqueness or importance would do nicely, however. -- wtfunkymonkey 05:14, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Comparing this to other articles on Bemani artists, this one seems to have even more information than most, though more sources couldn't hurt. What keeps this from being a weak keep or neutral is the fact that this was put up on AfD very shortly after its creation leads me to question the faith of the nominator, who is a fairly well-known troll in the Bemani community, and has a very long history of bad faith actions here. As for the sources, the Broadjam page linked to on the article does refer to the song and the artist in question, and the artist is not a Konami employee, so the reference would be third-party. --Core desat 16:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - fan known for making remixes of songs, has a song on DDR. Trollderella 17:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable individual beyond possibly needing a one sentence ref in DDR. JohnnyBGood t c VIVA! 19:48, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment He's a liscensed artist, he can't be stuck into Ultramix 4 page. He's going to be releasing an album in less than a month, so what would be the point of deleting it only to reopen it in a matter of days? Not to mention that he's notable by those WP rules. MarsPhoenix 21:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets notability criteria. I suggest we merely add sources. Pumeleon 10:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC) [Forgot to sign after login][reply]
Redirect per Hyperbole; nn. Eusebeus 00:52, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Why redirect him to Ultramix 4 page? There are no other artists on there, plus he's a lisenced artist. MarsPhoenix 00:56, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think the notability of this artist has been proven, what with his work being featured in 4 published games, and a CD due out next month. We may need some sources to satisfy the credibility of the article, but this isn't anything that won't be handled soon enough. DarkProdigy 02:12, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm leaning towards keep. The fan-done-good angle is probably sufficient notability in itself. Potential shortness of the article is a worry but that can be debated at a later date. Definitely wouldn't back a delete at this stage. Sockatume 05:03, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per MarsPhoenix. --badlydrawnjeff talk 11:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per MarsPhoenix and Coredesat. Very notable if you actually think about it. ~ EdBoy^[p]\_[m]/^[c] 03:28, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Kind of a weak delete. Lots of other Bemani artists don't have dedicated articles, especially in the cases where a particular artist only has a couple of songs in a game. I'll concede that the "fan done good" angle is a potential reason to keep it around. At the very least, the unverified (and likely unverifiable) research and obvious vanity bio should be removed or revised.Drano 14:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge unless if you can write more than five reliably sourced sentences about him. Ashibaka tock 05:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This article contains much more information than many other Bemani artists, and as Pumeleon has said earlier, it meets the notability criteria. Just add a few sources and it will be fine. Also, to add onto this, keep per The Pokémon Test. DM Ashura is, in the eyes of many, more notable a Bemani artist than many others. The page should stay on this note alone.Bkid 11:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Question - is it the fact that he's been licensed for DDR specifically that's making him "notable", or that he's been licensed for a rhythm game? If the latter, I'm going to write arch0wl - he has songs in O2Jam too. --SPUI (T - C) 15:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. First, please bold your first word so everything is easier to read. Thanks. :) Now to answer your question: He's "notable" because, minus any Bemani connections, he is still a up and coming musician that is very well known (although mostly just throughout the Bemani community). His success may spread later so that he is well known thoughout any music community, but we can't tell the future, now can we? So are you saying let's not give him a page until he's "really really really" famous? And who decides when that is? Bkid 00:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going into academic research, I could be really famous some day. Do I get an article? As for "who decides when he is": usually the measure is whether the press have said enough about someone to write a decent encyclopedia article about them. Sockatume 01:02, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But have you done any big research yet? DM Ashura has made plenty, and I mean PLENTY of songs already. His talent is pretty obvious to me. MarsPhoenix 03:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment A redirect here doesn't seem to make a whole lot of sense, as others have noted. One, there aren't any other artists mentioned on the pages suggested to redirect to, and two, such a redirect seems out of place—I know it has been suggested in past AfDs for Rob Levin, which was thought to be unreasonable by Jimbo and others. This isn't the same situation at all, but the point remains that a redirect doesn't seem to be a good solution. I think Coredesat and MarsPhoenix said everything else very well. In repsonse to SPUI, keeping in mind WP:POINT, creating another article "because DM Ashura exists" doesn't seem to be very sound reasoning.

Note, the previous comment was added by me, although I forgot to sign it and log in. Oops. dougk (Talk ˑ Contribs) 03:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]