Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Cavenaugh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2a02:c7f:4481:8300:90dc:e235:5074:54b0 (talk) at 18:35, 19 September 2019 (Kevin Cavenaugh: Draftify recommendation). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Kevin Cavenaugh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable outside of his company, promotional content, lacks WP:RS and fails WP:GNG. Wikipedia is not a linkedin for organisation's CEO and executives. Meeanaya (talk) 04:46, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. J947(c), at 04:50, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. J947(c), at 04:50, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To allow for proper assessment of the sources above.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 11:17, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:14, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or create a page for the company, theres something notable here. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 05:01, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify' - I agree that it is likely that there is a notable page that is itching to get out. The problem with the article is that much of the sourcing is very local and doesn't yet meet WP:BIO. The Portland Mercury is always likely to write about one of its own, for example. I don't think that we are in a position to referee whether an article on Cavenaugh or Guerrilla Development is the better way forward. Best, I think, to draftify to enable further development. 2A02:C7F:4481:8300:90DC:E235:5074:54B0 (talk) 18:35, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]