Jump to content

User talk:Roscelese

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GayOrdinaryChristian (talk | contribs) at 20:12, 23 September 2019. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

You deleted my offering regarding an estimate by Linda Fairstein of false rape allegations as a percentage of all reports. Why? Are you just censoring salient information? Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.121.6.97 (talk) 20:19, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


February 2016 – Discretionary Sanctions/Alert (topic=ab) – abortion

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Abortion, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33

False accusation of rape article

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:False_accusation_of_rape#Percents_in_lead

Catholic Church and homosexuality

Problematic sourcing

Hello Roscelese,

Are you sure the source that is the base for this diff is properly given? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=False_accusation_of_rape&diff=910401579&oldid=910393024 As it stands it has all wrong: book name, first 2 links have zero relevance and the 3rd is inaccessible. I haven't looked at this article for months but you could remember something. Thanks. --J. Sketter (talk) 03:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@J. Sketter: The source very clearly supports these statements. What is the issue that you're having? –Roscelese (talkcontribs) 06:34, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove my writing in the Bible and homosexuality? It isn't self-undermining.