User talk:StraussInTheHouse
- You can create a new thread by clicking here. Please give descriptive titles to new sections.
- If you're leaving a message in an existing thread, please indent your posts with colons.
- Please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
- Replies will be made here, please notify me of discussions elsewhere with {{ping|StraussInTheHouse}}.
- Experienced users may stalk this page and answer any queries.
- If you're contacting me about a draft, please read the FAQ page first.
Review of Draft:Meute (part 2)
Hi there StraussInTheHouse. Thank you for your response at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:StraussInTheHouse/Archive_6#Review_of_Draft:Meute
According to the Draft:Meute page, section Editor resources: "This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review." E.g. I cannot tell if the original author has submitted the article a 2nd time, awaiting approval/rejection, or if I need to do something to get the "currently awaiting re-review" status off the article so that I can resubmit it. Riaanvn (talk) 08:21, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
I managed to get help on the IRC channel. I see the article was submitted again in June. I will await the review. You can ignore this query. Riaanvn (talk) 04:09, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Deletion of Draft:TechnoArt_LIVE
Hello, SITH and thank you for your work. I was not in time to edit the page (I didn't check Wiki for messages) and I did see the message only 5 minutes ago, but the page was deleted already. I would like to edit the article and finish it. Can this draft (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:TechnoArt_LIVE&action=edit&redlink=1) be undeleted?
Thanks, Respectfully — Preceding unsigned comment added by PesTenamo (talk • contribs)
- Hi PesTenamo, undeletion requests can be made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. I'm not an administrator so I don't have the capability to do that, however, unless the copyright violation was marginal, which I would suspect it wasn't otherwise revision deletion would have been used, I'm unsure as to whether an administrator would be willing to reverse a G12, but that's up to the administrator in question. Many thanks, SITH (talk) 12:38, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
That was quite the rollercoaster ride of teamwork!
Thank you for the teamwork that just happened in resolving the vandalism at the Conan Doyle page. Just went to report them to the vandalism section but you were already there!
Cheers! Yeetcetera (talk) 13:53, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
- Yeetcetera, no problem and thanks for your reverts too! It was going quite quickly I must admit. Cheers, SITH (talk) 14:26, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Cartonplast
Good evening I don't understand why you have put the advise that Cartonplast's page have some issues, you said that there aren't book and newspapers article as references.....but if you go on the external link you can see that there are book and newspapers article as well. An other question....why the Coroplast page is ok and Cartonplast page not?They have identic structure! Bye Giovannicaciotta (talk) 15:06, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Giovannicaciotta, it's not that there are no independent, reliable sources in the references list, it's just that the inline citations rely far too heavily on affiliated or primary sources such as official websites. This, in turn, affects a claim to notability, which is why the notability tag is also there. The third tag is just a copyright revision deletion request, please see more about quoting at length here. I simply reviewed Cartonplast, that isn't a tacit endorsement of anything else that is on Wikipedia that may not be, as other stuff existing isn't a valid rationale for more things existing. If you have an issue with Coroplast, please either fix the issues, tag them for other editors to fix or if the problems are pervasive enough to warrant deletion, start a deletion discussion. Many thanks, SITH (talk) 12:34, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Change the name of The Farmers Bank Limited
Dear Concern,
The Farmers Bank Limited has been renamed as Padma Bank Limited and logo has been also changed.
Therefore we want to change the Header name as well as want to update the new logo.
Parthasahabd (talk) 18:34, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Partha SahaParthasahabd (talk) 18:34, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Parthasahabd, if you have a reliable source noting that, please cite it and put something like "In 2019 the company renamed to XYZ". Article titles are based on the common name. Furthermore, who is "we"? If you are in any way affiliated with the company or are being paid for your edits, you need to declare it on your userpage. Please see WP:COI for more. Thanks, SITH (talk) 18:43, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Tagging of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. I do not think that National Company Law Appellate Tribunal fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because copied language is largely a matter of factual statements in obvious expressions. Much of the duplicated text is a matter of fixed phrases that would have to be used in any article about teh tribunal. Not a blatant copyright infringement. I request that you consider not re-tagging National Company Law Appellate Tribunal for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 00:44, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Alona Rodeh -- draft
Dear SITH,
Thank you very much for taking the time to review the draft article. Your comment regarding the Biography section and the lack of inline citations is well received. I have added 11 new inline citations to the Biography section. They point to specific locations where Alona's exhibitions are referenced. I hope that this is what you have been looking for.
Thanks again!
Micky.rodeh (talk) 13:38, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Micky.rodeh (talk • contribs) 10:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Review of Draft:Pan-Romance language
Hello! I see that you have reviewed a draft article I'm working on and I have a question about copyright violations. The article is about a group languages and it includes a sample text of each language it deals with. The format of these sample texts (Blockquote template) is different from the main text of the article, and a note follows indicating the origin of the text. It's basically like a citation. Do you think it's ok? The first review marked one of those sample texts as a copyright violation, but not other sample texts. But back then the format was not so different from the main text.
The other issue on copyright violations has been corrected, I would say. I had reused some fragmets of an external text which I had myself written. Now I have reformulated these fragments, changed their structure, splitted them, added new information.
I have also added much more bibliography.
Thanks for your help. I don't have much experience in the Wikipedia, I'm afraid. --Jorcaiba (talk) 00:24, 16 October 2019 (UTC)