Jump to content

User talk:Clathrodrillia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 06:20, 20 November 2019 (Signing comment by Aarohee Bhattarai - "Aarohee peer review: new section"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Clathrodrillia, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:12, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Article Peer Review from Howie

[edit]

I would like to see more added to the “Remaining discussions” section and its subsections. An example of a transboundary conflict in the Middle East, Eastern Mediterranean, etc. would be helpful because it helps to reader see the real-world geographic nature of water bodies themselves, and how they always clash with boundaries of countries. I saw only one picture in the article, which is OK; a picture of the transboundary example could act as a visual break/ alleviator for the reader. The organization of the information, especially the size and selection of most of the sections/subsections are in nice digestible sizes. The most important thing that could be edited is the “Legal foundations and recognition” section. This section is very blocky (lot of content) and I feel breaking it into some subsections would help with the organization of its contents and its presentation to the reader. Connection to Sewage Sludge is that humans should have the right to process their waste effectively, cleanly, and without worry of cost; they should not have to resort to lesser contaminating methods because resources are not available to them to process their waste well. The lead is sufficient; though, I feel the content in the third paragraph “The clearest definition …” should come before the second because defining HRWS is most important following the term’s introduction. Berzzerkerz (talk) 06:39, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aarohee peer review

[edit]

Hello,

I really liked the way you have thought on working on this. I feel it is a really good way of working on this. Bringing up the ideas and the way they work on different countries is really important and helps understand the situation more clearly. I think adding the statistics and charts would also help in better understanding the matter. The idea on how you add the information on different countries, I think you should be able to better explain about all the important other aspects of it too. Good luck! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aarohee Bhattarai (talkcontribs) 06:19, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]