Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judge Matharu
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:57, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Judge Matharu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Matharu does not appear to have garnered significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, and therefore fails to satisfy the biographical and general notability guidelines. Please see the attached source assessment table. Much of the article is not supported by the citations provided and appears to be written like a curriculum vitae.
Source assessment table:
| ||||
| Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [1] |  Matharu co-authored the book.
|
Online shops are not reliable sources.
|
It is a book co-authored by Matharu, but it isn't about him.
|
✘ No |
| [2] | Published by a professional organisation, however it is one he is a member of and "involved with" its activities.
|
 No red flags in this instance.
|
One of Matharu's publications is mentioned once in a further reading section.
|
✘ No |
| [3] | Fundraising page operated by Matharu.
|
~ For basic details, yes. For corroborating achievements, no. | By virtue of being self-published.
|
✘ No |
| [4] | Does not appear to be affiliated with the school.
|
It is a transcript of a speech he has given and it is cited in the article to back up his own claims.
|
A transcript of a speech is not significant coverage.
|
✘ No |
| [5] | Ditto.
|
Ditto.
|
Ditto.
|
✘ No |
| [6] | Appears to be unaffiliated.
|
Internal news article of an reputable institute.
|
Matharu is mentioned once in passing.
|
✘ No |
| [7] | As with source 2.
|
More red flags than the source 2. It's a documentation of several workshops, one of which Matharu ran for APM, with no indication that the press office was a separate arm of the association.
|
Mentions his name, but the paragraph about his workshop is dedicated to the workshop content itself.
|
✘ No |
| [8] | Clearly published by an affiliated organisation: "MEET YOUR COURSE MANAGER".
|
~ For basic details, probably. For claims of notability, especially in a prospectus-like publication, no. | The column dedicated to Matharu does cover him in detail, by virtue of being affiliated.
|
✘ No |
| This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. | ||||
References
- ^ https://www.amazon.co.uk/Practical-Benefits-Realisation-Management-Delivering/dp/0993294707/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1468144283&sr=1-1
- ^ https://www.apm.org.uk/sites/default/files/apm_sig_brochure_september%202015.pdf
- ^ https://web.archive.org/web/20160820171422/http://archive.bmycharity.com/judgedredd/
- ^ http://sme.bit.edu.cn/Home/enxw/enxzbg/20888.htm
- ^ http://sme.bit.edu.cn/Home/enxw/enxwzx/21721.htm
- ^ https://web.archive.org/web/20160807222547/https://www.tradingstandards.uk/extra/news-item.cfm/newsid/636
- ^ https://www.apm.org.uk/news/benefits-summit-2015-pragmatic-benefits-realisation-management/
- ^ https://issuu.com/iirmeconference/docs/benefitsmgmt
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SITH (talk) 14:56, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SITH (talk) 14:56, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete we lack enough reliable, indepdent secondary sources to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:08, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - per the list above, there is not enough significant coverage in reliable sources. The essay would have to be re-written extensively; for example, every mention of his first name would have to be changed to his last name according to our style, and new sources would have to be found and added, while trivia excised. Bearian (talk) 19:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.