Talk:International Simultaneous Policy Organization
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Untitled
This page was previously the "Simultaneous Policy Organization" - I moved it to match both the organization's name and links on the Simultaneous policy page. --Cje 08:08, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
The original article was strongly POV - a brief ISPO manifesto. In my rewrite I made some of the statements from the article quotations and attributed them to the ISPO. I think this is accurate as the the name John Bunzl with his title "Director International Simultaneous Policy Organisation (ISPO)" appeared at the bottom as a signature.I have not contacted Mr Bunzl to confirm that he wrote the article, but it certainly seems consistent with the ISPO's website.
Finally, I removed some material as it seemed to be unnecessary overlap with Simultaneous policy
--Cje 09:12, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Self-published sources
Nearly this entire article is based upon self-published sources. I believe its author User:Fountain Posters to be a paid editor.24.22.129.215 (talk) 04:09, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
- [Sigh] Now I've heard everything. Sorry, so long that I've forgotten, lets see: Global Public Media, Guardian, TED are all referenced sources. Please be my guest to check to see the articles I have edited. From the top of my head I'd guess that 99.99% of subjects that I have edited over the years have little to no money. So I'll take your suggestion as a backhanded compliment. I must get a life and stop editing; so please, more suggestions like this - it really puts me off editing (and therefore may help me get one). Fountain Posters (talk) 04:51, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Meaningless without linked page, which is now gone
This article is uninformative on its own because it never explains what Simultaneous Policy is. That was presumably fine when there was a separate Wikipedia article called "Simultaneous Policy" (as two links in this article imply), but unfortunately that article seems to have been deleted because now those links just redirect back to this page. Without such an explanation, this article is so circular as to be meaningless. Can someone restore the deleted article or add explanatory content to this one? 153.31.112.21 (talk) 12:58, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- You are right, so I copied text from old article "Sim...Pol" to this one. They should not be separate articles at this time. (To access the old aricle and it's history , clink on the line that says "redirected from"... ) Some reduncy needs to be reduced, have at it. GangofOne (talk) 21:09, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Election and voting-related organizations & Electoral reform groups
This page is listed under Election and voting-related organizations & Electoral reform groups, however nothing in the text supports that.
- Stub-Class Elections and Referendums articles
- WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles
- Stub-Class organization articles
- Unknown-importance organization articles
- WikiProject Organizations articles
- Stub-Class Environment articles
- Unknown-importance Environment articles
- Stub-Class International relations articles
- Unknown-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles