Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badabun

Badabun

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Badabun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to be notable outside of the controversy listed in the Controversy section of the article. letcreate123 (talk) 19:51, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:10, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:10, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

• Delete' - one of thousands of controversial YouTube channels. Bearian (talk) 02:04, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
• Weak Keep - They are one of the largest and (by the important metric of raw subscribers) most successful media channels on the internet; I don't think it's fair to suggest they are not notable simply because the article largely focuses on their controversies - nor do I think the fact something is controversial negates their actual notability. That said, the article as it stands is largely about a single set of controversies. I think there's a proper article to be had on this topic, it just needs to focus on the actual channel rather than a single incident. See WP:NPOSSIBLE. -Rushyo ^Talk 23:17, 14 January 2020 (UTC)