Talk:Cytokine release syndrome

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Cytokine release syndrome.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Medicine Start‑class Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment

Is this the same as, or a weak form of, cytokine storm? Also, "the antibodies bind to the T cell receptor, activating the T cells before they are destroyed." What does "they" refer to, the antibodies, the T cells or the receptors? AxelBoldt 05:23, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The whole entry is unsourced. It is unclear in what sense it is different from cytokine storm. The present term (CRS) covers exactly the pathogenesis of the former. It seems CRS gained currency as part of the anti-CD28 disaster. JFW | T@lk 11:40, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See. JFW | T@lk 07:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Surely this article should be merged into "cytokine storm"? Marchino61 (talk) 07:19, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did it the other way. This is actually the more general concept, "storm" being severe CRS. Jytdog (talk) 21:33, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths?

Removed the reference to deaths for the 2006 TGN 1412 phase I trials. None of the subjects died. 2601:240:8101:3140:C1ED:AD20:69B0:E1AD (talk) 06:52, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for fixing that. Jytdog (talk) 15:35, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disastrous

i don't often use adjectives when i write WP content, but the trial of TGN 1412 was a disaster and has been widely referred to that way. we can go with no adjective. But if we use one it needs to be something negative. The trial was unambiguously a negative event. Jytdog (talk) 15:13, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

new coronavirus

WUHAN VIRUS/Experts find how moderate 2019-nCoV infection ends with death possible cause for some of the deaths of otherwise healthier individuals in current outbreak.Mercurywoodrose2600:1700:5FA1:61B0:B917:BBF8:5992:6B9 (talk) 19:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]