Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of people with coronavirus disease 2019

Deletion result

The result is clearly no consensus. But deleted by admin! We can't be satisfied. We'll report admin Barkeep49 for wrong decision and put on deletion review! Shame on you!117.18.231.143 (talk) 04:12, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Personal attack removed) 27.123.136.58 (talk) 06:32, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:AGF. -- CptViraj (📧) 06:33, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is a consensus that individuals who meet WP:GNG and die of the disease should be mentioned. A list of everyone who coughed and sneezed during the outbreak has problems with WP:NOT. Glad I'm not an admin, as I would have deleted and ended up on the receiving end of personal attacks over this.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 07:16, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You speak common sense, ianmacm 👍 ——SN 54129 07:26, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I consider the deletion of this (highly informative) article a real shame. Is YouTube-like censorship arriving Wikipedia? What's next? A curfew for edition? --Zarateman (talk) 11:54, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, this was a book example of a no consensus. A possible consensus solution would have been, perhaps, to keep the notable people who died and remove the people who has just been diagnosed. My opinion, with all respect, is that there was here a unilateral decision of deleting the whole list with little respect to the debate and the interesting open questions. Eynar Oxartum (talk) 12:00, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]