Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chhattisgarh Youth Congress

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chhattisgarh Youth Congress

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A state wing of Indian Youth Congress. The article clearly fails WP:NORG. Even, via google search it doesn't seem to me that the subject will pass our notability criteria. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 10:51, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 10:51, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 10:51, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:24, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 03:19, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A quick Google search does not reveal any information significant enough to warrant an article of its own. Some non-English sources seem to have a bit of info, which if significant enough could warrant a section (or sub-section) on the Indian Youth Congress page. SerTanmay (talk) 08:19, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not display evidence of significant coverage about the branch separate from the parent organization. No contents worth merging. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:40, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shadow Closer Hi, I like to intern for closing discussion, I interpret this consensus as Delete, and I will hold for admin to proceed with delete xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 05:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.