Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circle (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy Delete. because I don't like circles (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Circle[edit]

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This should be deleted per WP:CIRCULAR.-KAP03 (^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 02:56, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete nom per WP:CIRCULAR MadameButterflyKnife yeah sure.talk 04:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I like it. Foxnpichu (talk) 17:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all shapes from existence. The square and all other shapes with points are too WP:POINTY and the circle and all other curves are too WP:CIRCULAR. Q.E.D. 2147 in Tibet, so they get Star Trek first, Pianostar9 (talk) 20:20, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Too many circles in existence. We need to make room for the Earth, people! –ToxiBoi! ^(contribs) 21:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete the Nominator per WP:NOM NOM NOM. Margalob (talk) 23:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.