Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hotjar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pilot333 (talk | contribs) at 16:38, 3 April 2020. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hotjar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After removing a lot of puffed-up, one-word mentions of the ocmpany used as sources, and after doing a search, I can only conclude that this is an WP:NCORP fail.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC) ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • You literally removed several sources with edit summary like "One word mentions are not rrs"[1] from the article without leaving any note on the article's talk page. Can you please explain how on word mention make a source not RS? Karieol51 (talk) 19:20, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
See the talk page for explanation. I found three examples where you added sources that do not even remotely support the claim they are used for. This disussion is for the notability of the subject.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 19:47, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Why should the article be deleted instead of editing it with proper sourcing. The company seems to have enough sources to confirm claims. One is: https://trends.builtwith.com/websitelist/Hotjar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pilot333 (talkcontribs) 00:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Hotjar is a popular tracker tool that is important - internet privacy concerns, what have you. I havent checked if it fails NCORP but that's irrelevant as the software itself is notable. Run a GScholar for "hotjar" - 451 hits. Run it again for "hotjar privacy concern" 44 hits. Added a link to the article MrCleanOut (talk) 11:44, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:00, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep In my experience, Hotjar is a big name for heatmaps, visitor recordings, user feedback etc. I've used it extensively on my sites so I have first-hand experience with the topic outside of Wikipedia. There are tutorials on it available online, which is often used for WP:SIGCOV. There are 23 pages of Google News results for the search Hotjar. A search on WorldCat also brings up 14 published books. Surely there are enough reliable sources out there to form an article with correct claims to pass WP:NCORP. Pilot333 (talk) 16:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]