Jump to content

User talk:FlushingLocal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 94.196.18.251 (talk) at 23:24, 18 April 2020 (R179 New York City subway car). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AahdTahar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AahdTahar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Stop thinking that the R32s will be retained. MTA clearly said in a video conference at 8:00:02 that the R32s will be retiring by mid 2020

R179

I’ll stop with the edit war. I think we’re carrying this too far. I do wish to discuss about the YouTube steam though and see what we can come up with for the references. A.R.M. 21:18, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ARMcgrath: I just made a talk discussion about this on the R179 page. Take a look and message me there. FlushingLocal (talk) 21:19, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@FlushingLocal: ok A.R.M. 21:20, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Soundview-1.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Soundview-1.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 14:00, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on R179 (New York City Subway car); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Brass tacks: First, that source is perfectly valid. It's an official recording of an official meeting hosted on the official channel of the agency wherein the official in charge says in plain English that the R32s are being retired in 2020, replaced by R179s. You have refused to acknowledge that fact.

Secondly, the result of the prior discussion is irrelevant. Between the source and the fact that you are the only one continuously reverting what is, at this point, half a dozen editors, it's clear there's a new consensus, and you are edit warring against that consensus. Stop. That way leads to a block. oknazevad (talk) 17:16, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

R179 New York City subway car

Hi FlushingLocal. You may like to know that the sardonic comment above may just serve as a noose to its arrogant author. He obviously knows the rules otherwise he would not template you with his joke that you are edit-warring while he alone is the reason you have been sucked into it. At the time of my writing, you have reverted TWICE notwithstanding your original edit which removed nothing and therefore cannot be deemed a revert. He however has reverted FOUR TIMES and stands in violation of 3RR, something that cannot be superceded by any editor's personal opinion that they are right and everyone else is wrong. He has done four reverts inside seven hours. If I were you (as admins never listen to IPs), I'd report the case. --94.196.18.251 (talk) 23:21, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PS If you have admitted you were the earlier IP - something legit with robo-logouts which occur according to settings - then you ae on three which is still legit provided you don't revert if he tries it a FIFTH time. --94.196.18.251 (talk) 23:23, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]