User talk:Kautilya3

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20

Need a proper live citation

It seems that with your recent edit to Tablighi jamaat ,there is no such live citation so reverting,if I have made a mistake welcome you to discuss on my talk page Anatomycbmcb (talk) 00:44, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anatomycbmcb, there was a technical error with the citation, which I have now fixed. Still, when it is long-standing content, the normal practice is to tag it with {{failed verification}} rather than to delete the content. You should delete it only if you are confident that no reliable sources for the claim exist. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 08:12, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The citation that you have mentioned did not support the contents which is present there ,there is no mention of the given lines ,in the citation,so reverting Anatomycbmcb (talk) 13:48, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

i not understand

you msg on my talk page what do you mean I don't understand Royal711 (talk) 08:09, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 08:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Wire (India)

For the edit I had made on The Wire, Tweet was a reliable source. What is the basis to discredit it? It was from the official account of Hoshiarpur Police.

I've posted a discussion topic on the Talk page of the article. Pls share your thoughts there

-- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmmanjesh (talk • contribs) 17:01, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The first sentence of WP:RS, to which I have referred you multiple times, says that Wikipedia is based on reliable, published sources.

Tweets are not "published". And nothing says that the police are "reliable". -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:52, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you deleting the tablighi page

Hey Surpalsingh (talk) 10:07, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted under an WP:AfD. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:49, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Section on Myths about Hinduism has been deleted

The edit on hinduism had several references to reliable sources from history books, journal, other wikipedia pages. I am not sure why the entire content has been deleted? -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaykul72 (talk • contribs)

Even though you cite some reliable sources, there is not much correlation between what they say and your text. For example, you says "the four qualities are misinterpreted" and cite this BBC article. Where does the BBC say anything was "misinterpreted"?

You are essentially writing your own opinions on Wikipedia. But it is not Wikipedia's purpose to give you an opportunity to publish your personal views. Please read carefully the policies of Wikipedia given on your talk page. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 08:10, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sino-Indian War 1962

Hi, I'm not sure why you have taken offence at my edits or insisted that they are an attempt to paraphrase a historians words.

As I stated on the other thread, the hunt for the Dalai Lama DID prompt increased Chinese military aggression in Tibet and the border regions of Ladakh. That is what is written in the book and is backed up by these three independent sources: https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2011/apr/01/archive-dalai-lama-flees-to-india-1959, , https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/60-years-ago-dalai-lama-escaped-china-ruled-tibet-all-you-need-to-know-2008670, http://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,864579-1,00.html. All I said was that China resumed military patrols in April 1962 after India refused to agree to their terms- that is a fact.

Furthermore, here is another source verifying that the Chinese signalled their intent to start forward patrols in Ladakh in April 1962 on p104: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=_bjADwAAQBAJ&pg=PA103&lpg=PA103&dq=chinese+army+patrols+ladakh+april+1962&source=bl&ots=bPra_eME2D&sig=ACfU3U2xT4FzI_tR1n3ozKt6mjMXjH7Y0g&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi3p-GG3PDoAhVmTRUIHVejA9UQ6AEwCnoECA4QKQ#v=onepage&q=chinese%20army%20patrols%20ladakh%20april%201962&f=false. Considering these extensive sources, what is your reasoning for your incomplete editing and assertions that I am attempting to include my own opinions, when I am clearly not? -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kip1234 (talk • contribs)

I haven't taken "offence", but I am certainly getting irritated that you are not getting the point. WP:SYNTHESIS tells you that you cannot draw conclusions of your own from the published sources. You cannot even hint at them. Period. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:03, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking at it.

Hey there, I'm aware of what's happening at Andhra Pradesh Medtech Zone Limited and I find it very questionable, especially with that SPA that popped up to restore the content. I've asked Berean Hunter to look into matters as well, since I smell sock/meat editing. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cyphoidbomb, I am not involved at that page. But I have watch-listed it now, and will see if I can help. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you kindly! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:40, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Exodus of Kashmiri Pandits

Please reply on the talk page of that article. Looks like you are running away from the facts, so that's why you ain't replying.. Bhattakeel9 (talk) 08:40, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Responded. Let me reiterate that, if I see any further disruption from you on that page, I will be reporting you. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:29, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Urdu

Hello, The statements you made on Urdu article were reverted by Gotitbro, please return that edits, i don't made that statements. you and Anupam made that edits, Gotitbro says that edits are like sock.ok it would be like sock, but i only requested to correct it, i don't made edits. -- ImMuslimandimnotaterrorist (talk) 13:30, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Dear Kautilya3, For your tireless contribution to Nizamuddin Markaz Mosque and 2020 Tablighi Jamaat coronavirus hotspot in Delhi, you deserve this barnstar. Best. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 08:26, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Aaqib Anjum. That is very kind of you. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 08:48, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kasim Razvi

Hi there I have made one change regarding calling the situation "police action" to military intervention as its widely regarded an annexation and Police action was just a cover for the military invasion is it okay? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:3662:DD00:B597:7C53:697B:B4EB (talk) 08:00, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Dear Kautilya3, For your tireless contribution to so many articles, you deserve this barnstar.Souniel Yadav (talk) 03:59, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] దయచేసి మీ ఇ-మేల్ చూసుకోండి/ದಯವಿಟ್ಟು ನಿಮ್ಮ ಈ-ಮೇಲ್ ನೋಡಿ.Souniel Yadav (talk) 04:10, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Souniel Yadav. Welcome back. I prefer to keep all my Wikipedia discussions to be on Wikipedia itself. Enjoy editing! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 08:30, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

నేను ఇక్కడ ఇక్కడ ప్రస్తావించలేను, కాబట్టి దయచేసి మీ ఈ-మేలను తనిఖీ చేయండి

Barnstar purpose

Over at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wikipedia Awards, yesterday Pine asked "What do you have in mind for the purpose of the barnstar?". From the conversation over at the India notice-boards I can recall only two things -

To find an alternative barnstar to the current Hinduism barnstar. So additionally the purpose would also be borrowed - "The Hinduism Barnstar is awarded to those who make outstanding contributions to Hinduism-related content."
The symbolism of the diya itself is the unwritten purpose - Bringing light into the darkness.

However would you be able to add more specificity to this as asked for over at the talk page (edit: or want to add anything else); or is the above enough? DTM (talk) 09:52, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]