Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian Staghound
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 16:07, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Australian Staghound (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG. All four sources cited well short of being RS, Google search reveals nothing attributable. Cavalryman (talk) 10:59, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:12, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:15, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. The four websites appear to be drawing material from each other and do not cite references:
- Boardogs.com has material submitted by a contributor, with the website ceasing operations back in 2013
- Ozziedoggers.com has a link to Huntingpigdog.com and has no author
- Huntingpigdog.com is "Brought to you by http://www.ozziedoggers.org", has no author and ceased operations in 2014
- kangaroodog.org has no author and much of its text is the same as Boardogs.com, indicating the same contributor
- No mention in Google Books nor Scholar. Fails notability. William Harris
talk 22:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Teraplane (talk) 23:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.