User talk:Ylevental

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ylevental. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:28, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ylevental (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because a lot of the work I do is politically charged, the first three SPIs were made by people that were following me on Wikpiedia, not by admins or experienced editors Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ylevental/Archive. One of the admins figured out that the same connected group of people was going after me for four years. Special:Diff/945920522/945925090 and as you probably know, one of them was behind the User:Curse of Fenric attack on me. All the other reasons listed for this permanent block I do agree with.

I had only intended to make a few edits and create a few articles initially, but I was surprised at the initial wave of attacks back in early 2016. Being neutral on Wikipedia as a long-term user really requires a very strong sense of self-control. Probably should have read WP:CALM, WP:POINT and WP:CIVIL more in depth, although just about everything seems politically charged nowadays and is prone to conflict. And sometimes, the rules for editing can be really specific on what is expected. I will be fine with whatever decision is made. Ylevental (talk) 19:41, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request does not deal with the reason for your block: meatpuppetry. If you wish to be unblocked, you will need to address those concerns. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 21:54, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will be away for a while, so I won't be responding for a while Ylevental (talk) 18:10, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, whatever happens, and I really mean it, no WP:GRAVEDANCING. You will know if this does apply to you. Ylevental (talk) 19:41, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Citation for "Spatial cutoff frequency" page

@Srleffler: So I am blocked unfortunately (It's a really long story), but I did find a good citation for the Spatial cutoff frequency page, both coherent and incoherent.

Saleh, Bahaa E. A.; Teich, Malvin Carl (2019). Fundamentals of Photonics. John Wiley & Sons. p. 502. ISBN 978-1-118-77009-2. Retrieved 27 June 2020.

Feel free to copy and paste the source code of the reference. As mentioned, it's on page 502 viewable through Google books. And maybe, also include a sentence stating that the frequency of the incoherent system is derived from the autocorrelation of the coherent system. Thanks. Ylevental (talk) 17:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]