Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Link prediction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. Nominator withdrew nomination. Article will be moved back to draftspace. (non-admin closure) Schazjmd (talk) 23:49, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Link prediction

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the topic is likely to be notable (0.9 probability) the article at time of nomination is devoid of references, though there is a note to a learned paper. One of our major principles is verification, and this is unverified. While acknowledging that AfD is not a cleanup that is often a by-product of AfD. For me references will save the article. Without them I see no way of telling whether it is WP:OR Fiddle Faddle 22:17, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 22:17, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have a request on my talk page from the creating editor that the article be moved back to Draft: space. As nominator for discussion here I concur with that view, and suggest we SpeedyClose this discussion as Draftify. Fiddle Faddle 22:49, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.