Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public Oversight (United States)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:08, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Public Oversight (United States)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

pure advocacy, no references DGG ( talk ) 19:02, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm not even sure this is advocacy, but more of a new user misunderstanding what Wikipedia is about. This reads more like an opening (and unfinished) explanation for an online class about American government. Perhaps even a primer for a new citizenship class. — Maile (talk) 19:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-Wikipedia isn't the place for political opinion pieces. The article contains some elements that may be integrated or some that probably are already a part of existing articles, but it's all written in a completely ridiculous way and is nowhere near neutral. Also doesn't contain references.--Galebazz (talk) 19:39, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This isn't what wikipedia is about and for. The creeper2007^Talk! ^{Be well, stay safe} 19:56, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone above. ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 01:45, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others' comments. I note that the page's creator has commented here with their motivation and intentions for the page, but Wikipedia simply isn't the appropriate forum for this sort of material. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 10:25, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is an essay, not an article. Dgpop (talk) 13:44, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT and WP:OR. To create an encyclopedia article out of this essay or school report would take many hours. We just don't publish original research, and never have. In 2020, everybody knows what Wikipedia is about, and this isn't it. I would not oppose putting this in user space for somebody to work on it. Bearian (talk) 20:55, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.