Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Yorkshire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. SNOW Keep and a procedural close. Consider merging but AfD is really not the venue for this. Seddon ^talk 14:33, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

History of Yorkshire

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be merged into Yorkshire, since most of the information in the History section of that article is in this article. JTZegers (talk) 00:45, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – I see no problem with having a separate article that covers the history in much greater depth than can or should be done as part of the Yorkshire article. The prehistory section, for example, is far longer than would be suitable if merged. However, as the section in the Yorkshire article should be a summary of the History article I think that both articles need some improvement and reworking so that they both follow the same basic format in terms of headings for themes covered. Also I am not sure why has it been proposed for deletion rather than using the {{merge}} template. EdwardUK (talk) 03:35, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:36, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:36, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this is a very good article, this is a WP:SIZESPLIT --Devokewater @ 10:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep If most of the information in this article were in the history section of the Yorkshire article, then you'd have an argument for merging. This just looks like a WP:SIZESPLIT to me. YorkshireLad ✿ ^(talk) 10:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep There is a ton of literature on the history of Yorkshire, establishing it beyond doubt as a distinct topic. The article on Yorkshire as a whole should be broader than just the history. Richard Nevell (talk) 12:38, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.